Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport vs Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Potenza RE050A Pole Position leads by 8
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport
80
B — Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position
88
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A SportPotenza RE050A Pole Position
Tyre Reviews owners 80 90

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Potenza RE050A Pole Position leads by 24
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport
50
B — Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position
74
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A SportPotenza RE050A Pole Position
Tyre Reviews owners 50 75

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Potenza RE050A Pole Position leads by 13
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport
60
B — Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position
73
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A SportPotenza RE050A Pole Position
Tyre Reviews owners 60 85

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Advantage T/A Sport leads by 17
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport
80
B — Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position
63
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A SportPotenza RE050A Pole Position
Tyre Reviews owners 80 65

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Potenza RE050A Pole Position leads by 10
A — BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport
70
B — Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position
80
Why this score
SourceAdvantage T/A SportPotenza RE050A Pole Position
Tyre Reviews owners 70 80

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport vs Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich Advantage T/A SportBridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position
Relative Score 67 74
Dry 80 88
Wet 50 74
Comfort 60 73
Treadwear 80 63
Handling 70 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport

The BFGoodrich Advantage TA Sport is perceived as a performance-oriented all-season tire that excels in dry handling and cornering stability. While it offers a responsive and engaging driving experience, users note that this performance comes at the cost of increased road noise and slightly vague on-center steering feel.

Pros

  • Strong cornering grip and stability
  • Responsive steering feedback
  • Comfortable ride quality
  • Excellent dry weather performance

Cons

  • Higher than average road noise
  • Vague on-center steering feel

Observations

  • The tire is noted for its ability to handle spirited driving on backroads, suggesting suitability for drivers who prioritize handling over absolute cabin quietness.
Tire B Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position

The Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position is widely regarded as a high-performance summer tire that excels in dry grip, handling, and steering responsiveness. While users consistently praise its predictable breakaway characteristics and value, the soft compound results in rapid tread wear, making it better suited for spirited driving than high-mileage daily commuting.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry road grip and handling performance
  • Predictable and progressive breakaway behavior
  • Strong value proposition, particularly when found on clearance
  • Improved wet weather performance compared to predecessor models

Cons

  • Short tread life due to soft rubber compound
  • Poor energy efficiency, making it unsuitable for electric vehicles
  • Increased road noise compared to all-season alternatives

Observations

  • Performance-oriented rear-wheel-drive vehicles like the Nissan 350Z/370Z and BMW models benefit significantly from the tire's grip and handling characteristics.
  • Electric vehicle owners report significant efficiency penalties and increased noise, suggesting the tire is poorly optimized for EV range requirements.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport B · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tireSummer Max Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG600 - 660 A A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Bridgestone

Winner: Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position scores 74 vs 50 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport scores 80 vs 63 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position scores 73 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position scores 80 vs 70 on handling.

Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE050A Pole Position

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.