79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza S01 vs Firestone Firehawk 900 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
5 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S01 if dry and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Potenza S01 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S01 | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 78 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Firehawk 900 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S01 | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Firehawk 900 leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S01 | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Firehawk 900 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S01 | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 88 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Potenza S01 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S01 | Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 85 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S01 | Firestone Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 84 |
| Dry | 97 | 78 |
| Wet | 77 | 80 |
| Comfort | 70 | 90 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 88 |
| Handling | 97 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza S01 is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that prioritizes exceptional grip and handling dynamics over longevity and comfort. While enthusiasts appreciate its uncompromising performance in both wet and dry conditions, users should be prepared for rapid tread wear and a firm, noisy ride quality.
Pros
- Exceptional grip levels in both wet and dry conditions
- Superior handling characteristics favored by performance-oriented vehicles
- High-speed stability and performance consistency
Cons
- Very rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- High levels of road noise
- Stiff and uncomfortable ride quality
Observations
- Performance-focused vehicles like the Mitsubishi Evo 6 highlight the tire's tendency to wear out in sync with aggressive service intervals.
- Porsche OEM N-Spec variants are noted for being intentionally uncompromising, designed specifically to complement sport-tuned suspensions.
The Firestone Firehawk 900 is generally regarded as a reliable, balanced tire that offers commendable grip in both wet and dry conditions. While users appreciate its durability and comfort over rough road surfaces, the consensus is frequently tempered by reports of significant road noise, particularly with run-flat variants.
Pros
- Reliable wet and dry traction
- Strong durability and impact resistance against potholes
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Competitive price-to-performance ratio
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, especially at lower speeds
- Run-flat variants may be unsuitable for certain vehicle suspension setups
- Dry grip performance can degrade noticeably as the tire ages
Observations
- Users operating on poor road infrastructure report high satisfaction with the tire's structural integrity.
- Owners of premium vehicles like the Audi TT have reported dissatisfaction with noise levels when using run-flat versions of this tire.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S01 | B · Firestone Firehawk 900 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
Bridgestone
84
/ 100
Firestone
Winner: Firestone Firehawk 900 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza S01 if dry and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 88 vs 67 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Firehawk 900 scores 90 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Potenza S01 scores 97 vs 78 on dry.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Potenza S01 scores 97 vs 85 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S01
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk 900
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza S01 also compared with
Firestone Firehawk 900 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.