Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | 87 |
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 94 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
| America's Tire owners | 95 | – |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 100% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 100% | 100% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | 86 |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
| America's Tire owners | 85 | – |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 89% | 92% |
| Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) | 63% | 65% |
| Wet Braking - Cool (% of best) | 98% | 97% |
| Wet Braking - Worn (% of best) | 90% | 90% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 100% | 82% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 92% | 99% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 64 | 59 |
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
| America's Tire owners | 93 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 49 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
| America's Tire owners | 86 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 67 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | 74 |
| SimpleTire owners | 70 | – |
| America's Tire owners | 81 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Potenza Sport | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 88 |
| America's Tire owners | 90 | – |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | 86 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza Sport | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 77 |
| Dry | 91 | 90 |
| Wet | 86 | 88 |
| Comfort | 68 | 68 |
| Noise | 85 | 49 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 74 |
| Handling | 89 | 88 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 95% #3/7 · Best Performance Tyres For 2025 | 93% #4/9 · 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | +2.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 95% #5/7 · 2024 Sports Car Tyre Test | 80% #6/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | +15.3 | Different tests |
| Energy Consumption | Energy | 99% #7/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 96% #6/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | +3.1 | Same test |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 100% #18/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 97% #13/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +3.4 | Same test |
| Grass Traction | Grass | 90% #3/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 81% #3/10 · 2025 Autobild SUV Off-Road Summer Tyre Test | +9.1 | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Gravel | 100% #1/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 100% #2/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +0.5 | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Gravel | 94% #7/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 93% #4/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +1.2 | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Mud | 100% #1/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 91% #6/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +9.2 | Same test |
| Abrasion | Other | 58% #4/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 72% #7/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | -14.1 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 96% #10/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test | 95% #2/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | +0.9 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 93% #7/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 64% #8/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test | +29.4 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 84% #8/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | 45% #1/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | +39.6 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 85% #4/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | -15.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/11 · 2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test | 50% #2/8 · 2025 Sports Cars Tyre Test | -33.3 | Different tests |
| Sand Traction | Sand | 86% #5/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test | 96% #2/9 · 2026 Summer SUV Tyre Test | -10.1 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 96% #4/7 · Top Tire Review 2026 UHP Tyre Test: Big Brands vs Challengers | 98% #3/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested | -1.7 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 80% #10/10 · 2022 Tyre Reviews UUHP Summer Tyre Test | 90% #6/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test | -10 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 100% #2/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 80% #11/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | +20 | Different tests |
| Subj. Noise | Subj | 90% #6/7 · 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 60% #5/6 · 2025 Vi Bilagare Summer EV Tyre Test | +29.8 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 100% #3/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test | 70% #13/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | +30 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #8/8 · 2024 EV Tyre Test | 0% #1/20 · 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 89% #7/7 · 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test | 92% #7/20 · 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | -2.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 63% #2/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 65% #4/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | -2.2 | Same test |
| Wet Braking - Cool | Wet | 98% #5/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested | 97% #4/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested | +0.3 | Same test |
| Wet Braking - Worn | Wet | 90% #1/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested | 90% #2/6 · The BEST Performance Tyres Tested | 0 | Same test |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 100% #1/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | 82% #2/6 · 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | +17.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 92% #1/10 · 2023 AZ UHP Summer Tyre Test | 99% #8/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | -6.3 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza Sport is widely regarded as a top-tier Ultra-High Performance tire that excels in steering precision, dry handling, and wet-weather confidence. While it is frequently praised for its near-track-level grip and direct feedback, users consistently note that these performance benefits come at the cost of rapid tread wear and increased road noise. It is best suited for enthusiasts who prioritize driving dynamics over longevity and comfort.
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Sharp, telepathic steering response and feedback
- High-speed stability and confidence-inspiring handling
- Excellent rim protection due to robust sidewall construction
Cons
- Rapid tread wear, particularly under spirited driving
- High levels of road noise
- Firm ride quality that transmits road imperfections
- Performance drop-off in cold temperatures
Observations
- Heavy vehicles, including EVs and high-torque sedans, report significantly accelerated tread wear compared to lighter hatchbacks.
- The tire's stiff sidewall provides excellent rim protection but is noted to be less compliant on rough road surfaces, leading to a harsher ride in some applications.
- Users with performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., BMW M-series, Porsche, Golf R) report that the tire requires a brief warm-up period to reach its full grip potential.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is widely regarded as a top-tier ultra-high-performance tire that excels in balancing daily comfort with impressive wet and dry grip. Most users report a significant improvement in handling, noise levels, and ride quality compared to their previous tires, making it a highly competitive and often more affordable alternative to premium rivals like the Michelin Pilot Sport series.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip with predictable handling at the limit.
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise for a performance-oriented tire.
- Strong value proposition compared to other premium UHP brands.
- Excellent steering responsiveness and feedback.
- Effective rim protection design.
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by many users, particularly under spirited driving.
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' or floaty feeling during aggressive cornering.
- Some reports of high road noise on rough or non-smooth asphalt surfaces.
- Performance can be inconsistent until the tires reach optimal operating temperature.
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the Asymmetric 6 consistently report a transformative improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in tramlining.
- Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque setups often report faster-than-expected tread wear on the rear axle.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Mazda MX-5, Suzuki Swift) frequently praise the tire's agility and progressive behavior at the limit.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
Community opinion on the Bridgestone Potenza Sport and its variants is generally mixed, praising their exceptional dry and wet grip, direct steering response, and sharp handling while raising concerns about fuel economy/rolling resistance, tire wear, and occasional durability issues. The newly introduced Potenza Sport AS and Evo models are drawing positive initial comparisons against major competitors like Michelin and Continental, specifically addressing previous generation shortcomings.
“Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo - quick initial review - 250 miles Very early impression on this newly released update, used as a track tyre on my modded MX-5 done about 50 laps at Bedford Autodrome GT layout, 8-15C air temp, as well as to and from the track. Fun track tyres, great handling feedback and direct steering feel, plenty of grip when push and stable through corner. Confident under heavy braking. Track performance much improved overall compared to the PS4 previously which was quite snappy at limit. Not driven in the wet yet so cannot comment on wet performance. Not driven enough to comment on wear but seems decent after 50 laps/250 miles Road noise is louder, and side wall is stiffer compared to PS4, maybe by ~10%. Would recommend, especially if you can get them on a deal. I paid £330 for 4 corners fitted. Size was 225/45/17. The side wall is quite pretty too if you care for this. Read more”
“Bridgestone Potenza Sport Anybody running potenza sports? My rear right tire inside sidewall got shredded suddenly at highway speed (85+ mph). Fortunately I did not lose control and was able to move the car to a nearby school parking lot with a spare. Ordered a set of DWS06+ and they should be delivered tomorrow. The tires are a little more than 4 years old and had about 12k miles on them. Kind of bummed at the situation, but this could’ve been much worse. Are potenza sports generally that bad? Read more”
“Bridgestone potenza sport after 2 years Lots of haircracks in my potenza sports that I bought 2 years ago. The DOT is week 16 of 2021. Is this normal? Driven approximately 25000 kms with these tyres. Only the rear tyres show these marks is this normal? The fronts of the same age and kms look fine Size: 245/35/18 Read more”
“I’ve been running the Potenza Sport for the past 2 years during the warm months here in CO on my G37, and they’ve been great. In my experience they worsen my mpg by 3 mpg (depends how I’m driving) and they’ve worn extremely well considering I have -2.5 degrees of camber. I will say the best part is the steering response, it makes my heavy G37 feel way lighter with how good the steering response is and I feel way more confident under braking and cornering in the canyons.”
Based on 33 community posts
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
Community opinion on the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is largely positive, with many drivers praising its balance of performance, wet/dry grip, and pricing compared to direct competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series. While a few users noted concerns regarding comfort, cold-weather performance in tests, or potential high-speed vibrations, the vast majority recommend them as top-tier daily driving and spirited performance tires.
“215/45 R17 — Primacy 4+ or Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 for a daily driver My current tyres have developed deep cracks so they need replacing. The annoying part is that half the tyres people recommend simply don't exist in 215/45 R17, which cuts the list down fast. The two that keep coming up are the Michelin Primacy 4+ and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6, but they seem built for completely different drivers. Context: 2024 skoda Fabia 1.5 TSI. I'm not a sporty driver commuting and errands, occasionally push the pedal on an on-ramp, nothing crazy. Hot dry climate with heavy rain in winter and zero snow, so summer tyres only. What I actually want is longevity, comfort and solid wet grip. Quiet would be a bonus. Is the Asymmetric 6 just overkill for how I drive? And is there anything else in this size I should be looking at Read more”
“Goodyear EfficentGrip Performance 2 vs. Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I'm struggling to choose between the two as there is currently a deal on which means the difference in price is only £5 per tyre. I think that means the Asy6 is the no brainer, but my use case doesn't call for a UHP. I value comfort, road noise and resistance to dry cracking over anything else. I don't do many miles. I've already got the Asy6 on the rear axle (came with the wheels) and I'm looking to buy 2 new tyres for the front. I'll need rears at some point probably in the next year. I'd like my car to be more comfortable on broken roads, but I don't think the tyres are the main issue. The car is a Merc C180 estate family car. With 2 young kids, I don't exactly push the car hard. It mostly sits on the motorway or pootles around town. Am I overthinking it? Fronts: 225/45/17 Rears: 245/40/17”
“I've had the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 (235/45/18). They were really sturdy, comfort was super bad with them and I sold them for half the price. These are sport tyres, you do not need them.”
“No EV ready logo on Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 I recently bought Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 255/45R19 104Y XL SCT tyres. According to this article, this tyre should contain EV Ready logo but my tyres do not have it. I discussed with seller and they claimed that this tyres are ev ready even if it does not have the ev ready logo. Is that possible ? Can i trust that my tyres are EV Ready ?”
Based on 21 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza Sport | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
| Sizes available | 71 | 98 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 17″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 7 - 10/32″ | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 - 320 A - AA A | 260 - 300 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 30,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | Black Side Wall - Vertical Serrated Band |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Goodyear
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza Sport — better noise. Pick the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 if treadwear matters most to you.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport scores 85 vs 49 on noise.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 scores 74 vs 64 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.