84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo vs Michelin Energy Saver — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
76/100
137 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Michelin Energy Saver if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Turanza T001 Evo leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 Evo | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Turanza T001 Evo leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 Evo | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 71 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Turanza T001 Evo leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 Evo | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 Evo | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 37 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 Evo | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Turanza T001 Evo leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T001 Evo | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo | Michelin Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 79 |
| Dry | 88 | 81 |
| Wet | 85 | 76 |
| Snow | – | 52 |
| Comfort | 85 | 80 |
| Noise | – | 37 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 85 |
| Handling | 87 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
Tire A
79
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/11 · 2018 Auto Review 225/45 R17 Tyre Test | 7% #15/47 · 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview | +13.3 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo is generally regarded as a high-performing summer tire that excels in dry and wet grip, offering a stable and comfortable driving experience. While users praise its handling characteristics and road feedback, the tire is subject to criticism regarding its fuel efficiency and a notable lack of clear sidewall branding to distinguish it from the previous generation T001.
Pros
- Excellent grip in both dry and wet road conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and stability
- Strong road feedback and handling performance
Cons
- Poor fuel economy compared to competitor ratings
- Lack of 'Evo' branding on the sidewall causes confusion with the older T001 model
- Reports of audible humming or noise at town speeds
- Inconsistent tread wear performance
Observations
- Users noted that tread wear can be accelerated during winter months, suggesting the compound may be sensitive to temperature fluctuations.
- The physical identification of the 'Evo' variant requires counting longitudinal grooves (four) rather than relying on sidewall markings.
The Michelin Energy Saver is widely regarded as a class-leading tire for longevity and fuel efficiency, often exceeding 40,000–60,000 miles for many users. While it excels in dry conditions and provides a comfortable, quiet ride, it receives consistent criticism for a decline in wet-weather performance as the tread wears down and a tendency for the rubber compound to develop sidewall cracking over time.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Reliable dry-weather handling and stability
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip as the tire ages
- Susceptibility to sidewall cracking and dry rot after 3-4 years
- Hard compound can feel 'skating' or insecure in cold or wet conditions
- Lack of road feedback for spirited driving
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or those driving on rough, pothole-prone roads noted that the sidewalls can be fragile and prone to damage.
- Drivers of small hatchbacks (e.g., VW Polo, Ford Fiesta) frequently reported that the tire significantly improved steering lightness and overall handling compared to budget alternatives.
- Owners of high-mileage commuters and taxis consistently praise the tire for its cost-per-mile value, despite the performance drop-off in later years.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo | B · Michelin Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
84
/ 100
Bridgestone
79
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Michelin Energy Saver if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo scores 87 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo scores 85 vs 76 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo scores 88 vs 81 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo scores 85 vs 80 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.