Tests 71 · 3 tests Owners 75 · 7 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo vs Yokohama Bluearth E51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Turanza T001 Evo is ahead, 73–57
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 4 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Turanza T001 Evo +1756Why this score
Source Turanza T001 Evo Bluearth E51 Professional tests (TWG score) 70 – Reviews found online 77 49 -
78
Wet
Turanza T001 Evo +2256Why this score
Source Turanza T001 Evo Bluearth E51 Professional tests (TWG score) 79 – Reviews found online 76 52 -
72
Comfort
Turanza T001 Evo +1854Why this score
Source Turanza T001 Evo Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 75 39 -
66
Treadwear
Turanza T001 Evo +165Why this score
Source Turanza T001 Evo Bluearth E51 Professional tests (TWG score) 64 – Reviews found online 69 63 -
77
Handling
Turanza T001 Evo +3245Why this score
Source Turanza T001 Evo Bluearth E51 Reviews found online 77 45
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo | Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 57 |
| Dry | 73 | 56 |
| Wet | 78 | 56 |
| Comfort | 72 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 65 |
| Handling | 77 | 45 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza T001 Evo
Bluearth E51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza T001 Evo
Pros
- Excellent grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good high-speed stability and road feedback
Cons
- Subpar fuel economy despite the advertised EU rating
- Faster wear reported on front axles or during winter months
- Loud humming noise reported by some users
Tire B Bluearth E51
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Stable handling in dry conditions
- Adequate performance for standard commuting
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin resonance
- Harsh ride quality due to stiff sidewalls
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo | B · Yokohama Bluearth E51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
Yokohama Bluearth E51
Winner: Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo scores 77 vs 45 on handling.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo scores 78 vs 56 on wet.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo scores 72 vs 54 on comfort.
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo scores 73 vs 56 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.