82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
85/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT vs Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM30 RFT leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 RFT | Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM30 RFT leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 RFT | Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 77 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM30 RFT leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 RFT | Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 63 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM30 RFT leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 RFT | Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 56 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM30 RFT leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM30 RFT | Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 76 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT | Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 71 |
| Dry | 85 | 84 |
| Wet | 90 | 78 |
| Snow | 88 | – |
| Comfort | 78 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 57 |
| Handling | 80 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT is highly regarded for its exceptional winter traction, particularly in snowy and challenging road conditions. Users report significant improvements in mobility compared to standard tires, allowing for confident driving on uncleared surfaces.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and grip in deep snow
- Reliable performance on uncleared local roads
- Superior capability compared to non-winter tires on inclines
Cons
- Requires seasonal removal to preserve tread life
- Run-flat construction may influence ride characteristics
Observations
- Reported effective performance on rear-wheel-drive compact vehicles like the BMW 118d
- Demonstrated ability to outperform 4x4 vehicles equipped with non-specialized tires in snowy conditions
The Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT receives mixed feedback, often praised for its initial comfort and steering precision but frequently criticized for premature tread wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages. While many users appreciate its performance as a touring tire, the run-flat construction appears to be a polarizing feature that significantly impacts long-term ride quality and durability.
Pros
- Commendable initial ride comfort for a run-flat tire
- Responsive and direct steering feedback
- Strong dry and wet braking performance
- Low noise levels when new
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Susceptibility to structural damage and bulges from road impacts
- Harsh ride quality compared to non-run-flat alternatives
Observations
- BMW 3-series owners report a notable decline in ride quality and noise levels as the tires approach the end of their service life.
- Lexus UX owners have reported extreme cabin noise levels, suggesting the tire's acoustic profile may be poorly suited to certain vehicle chassis.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT | B · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Bridgestone
71
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT scores 75 vs 57 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT scores 78 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT scores 90 vs 78 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT scores 80 vs 76 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT
Tire B · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM30 RFT also compared with
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.