71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
11 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT vs Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
78/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 RFT | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 RFT | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 83 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 RFT | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 67 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 RFT | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 66 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 56 | 70 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Turanza T005 RFT | SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 84 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 78 |
| Dry | 84 | 87 |
| Wet | 78 | 83 |
| Comfort | 65 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 70 |
| Handling | 76 | 84 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT receives mixed feedback, often praised for its initial comfort and steering precision but frequently criticized for premature tread wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages. While many users appreciate its performance as a touring tire, the run-flat construction appears to be a polarizing feature that significantly impacts long-term ride quality and durability.
Pros
- Commendable initial ride comfort for a run-flat tire
- Responsive and direct steering feedback
- Strong dry and wet braking performance
- Low noise levels when new
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant increase in road noise as the tire wears
- Susceptibility to structural damage and bulges from road impacts
- Harsh ride quality compared to non-run-flat alternatives
Observations
- BMW 3-series owners report a notable decline in ride quality and noise levels as the tires approach the end of their service life.
- Lexus UX owners have reported extreme cabin noise levels, suggesting the tire's acoustic profile may be poorly suited to certain vehicle chassis.
The Continental SportContact 2 SSR is a polarizing run-flat tire that generally offers superior grip and comfort compared to older generation run-flat competitors like the Bridgestone Potenza. While many users appreciate its wet and dry performance, the tire's aging design is frequently criticized for uneven wear patterns, road noise, and a harsh ride quality on lower-profile fitments.
Pros
- Strong wet and dry traction performance
- Improved ride comfort compared to competing run-flat brands
- Respectable tread longevity for some users
- Reliable handling characteristics
Cons
- Tendency for uneven tread wear
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- Harsh ride quality on low-profile, staggered setups
- Dated design compared to modern tire iterations
Observations
- Users with higher-profile 16-inch tires report significantly better ride comfort than those using low-profile, staggered setups on BMW 3-series models.
- Drivers of E90/E92 BMW chassis report mixed experiences, with some noting premature or uneven wear on both front and rear axles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT | B · Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Bridgestone
78
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat — better treadwear, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat scores 70 vs 57 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat scores 84 vs 76 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat scores 83 vs 78 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat scores 87 vs 84 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT
Tire B · Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Turanza T005 RFT also compared with
Continental SportContact 2 SSR Run Flat also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.