Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Kumho KL33 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho KL33

Summer Premium Touring tires

Kumho KL33 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
73
Wet
65
Snow
–
Comfort
73
Noise
–
Treadwear
59
Handling
65

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 2
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
75
B — Kumho KL33
73
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
Professional tests (TWG score) 67 –
Tyre Reviews owners 85 73

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 8
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
73
B — Kumho KL33
65
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
Professional tests (TWG score) 67 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 65

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
71
B — Kumho KL33
–
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
Tyre Reviews owners 64 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 20
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
93
B — Kumho KL33
73
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tyre Reviews owners 76 73

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
90
B — Kumho KL33
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 27
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
86
B — Kumho KL33
59
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
Tyre Reviews owners 86 59

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 15
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
80
B — Kumho KL33
65
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2KL33
Tyre Reviews owners 80 65
DriverReviews owners – 84

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Kumho KL33: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2Kumho KL33
Relative Score 81 66
Dry 75 73
Wet 73 65
Snow 71 –
Comfort 93 73
Noise 90 –
Treadwear 86 59
Handling 80 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

The Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 is widely regarded as a durable, high-mileage tire that excels in dry and wet road conditions while offering respectable light off-road capability. While many users praise its quiet ride and longevity, some report a noticeable decline in comfort and increased noise levels in cold temperatures or on rougher road surfaces.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and high mileage capability
  • Strong traction on dry and wet pavement
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on standard roads
  • Capable performance on light off-road surfaces like gravel and sand

Cons

  • Harsh ride and increased noise on rough or damaged road surfaces
  • Poor performance in deep snow and icy conditions
  • Stiff sidewalls can feel uncomfortable at low speeds
  • Limited effectiveness in deep mud

Observations

  • Users with SUVs like the Peugeot 3008 and 5008 report the tire is well-suited for highway and town driving but can feel harsh on uneven terrain.
  • Pickup truck owners, such as those with the Nissan Navara, frequently highlight the tire's impressive durability and high-mileage lifespan under heavier loads.
  • Drivers of high-torque vehicles noted improved traction and reduced wheel spin compared to OEM alternatives like the Bridgestone Dueler H/T.
Tire B Kumho KL33

The Kumho KL33 presents a polarizing ownership experience, often serving as an OEM choice that delivers competent dry-weather performance and comfort when new. However, the consensus is significantly marred by reports of premature tread degradation, including chunking and delamination, alongside inconsistent long-term durability and poor manufacturer warranty support.

Pros

  • Strong initial dry traction and braking performance
  • Competitive price point offering good value for money
  • Generally comfortable and quiet ride quality when new
  • Satisfactory handling characteristics for standard suburban driving

Cons

  • Significant reports of tread block chipping, chunking, and premature wear
  • Concerns regarding structural integrity and potential delamination
  • Increased road noise as the tire reaches mid-life
  • Unresponsive customer service regarding warranty claims

Observations

  • Users on heavier SUVs and minivans like the Kia Carnival and Audi Q5 reported faster tread wear and lack of cornering feedback.
  • Drivers of diesel-powered SUVs noted better longevity and satisfaction compared to those with gasoline-powered or luxury-segment vehicles.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 B · Kumho KL33
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Kumho

Winner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 86 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 93 vs 73 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 80 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 73 vs 65 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Tire B · Kumho KL33

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.