Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G98A — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Geolandar G98A

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama Geolandar G98A tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
60/100
15 owner reviews
Dry
74
Wet
67
Snow
–
Comfort
61
Noise
–
Treadwear
49
Handling
68

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 1
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
75
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
74
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar G98A
Professional tests (TWG score) 67 –
Tyre Reviews owners 85 74

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 6
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
73
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
67
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar G98A
Professional tests (TWG score) 67 –
Tyre Reviews owners 80 67

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
71
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
–
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar G98A
Tyre Reviews owners 64 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 32
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
93
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
61
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar G98A
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tyre Reviews owners 76 61

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
90
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 37
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
86
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
49
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar G98A
Tyre Reviews owners 86 49

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiCrossContact LX 2 leads by 12
A — Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
80
B — Yokohama Geolandar G98A
68
Why this score
SourceContiCrossContact LX 2Geolandar G98A
Tyre Reviews owners 80 68

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G98A: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact LX 2Yokohama Geolandar G98A
Relative Score 81 62
Dry 75 74
Wet 73 67
Snow 71 –
Comfort 93 61
Noise 90 –
Treadwear 86 49
Handling 80 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2

The Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 is widely regarded as a durable, high-mileage tire that excels in dry and wet road conditions while offering respectable light off-road capability. While many users praise its quiet ride and longevity, some report a noticeable decline in comfort and increased noise levels in cold temperatures or on rougher road surfaces.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and high mileage capability
  • Strong traction on dry and wet pavement
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on standard roads
  • Capable performance on light off-road surfaces like gravel and sand

Cons

  • Harsh ride and increased noise on rough or damaged road surfaces
  • Poor performance in deep snow and icy conditions
  • Stiff sidewalls can feel uncomfortable at low speeds
  • Limited effectiveness in deep mud

Observations

  • Users with SUVs like the Peugeot 3008 and 5008 report the tire is well-suited for highway and town driving but can feel harsh on uneven terrain.
  • Pickup truck owners, such as those with the Nissan Navara, frequently highlight the tire's impressive durability and high-mileage lifespan under heavier loads.
  • Drivers of high-torque vehicles noted improved traction and reduced wheel spin compared to OEM alternatives like the Bridgestone Dueler H/T.
Tire B Yokohama Geolandar G98A

The Yokohama Geolandar G98A is generally regarded as a mediocre OEM tire that provides acceptable dry-road handling and comfort for daily commuting. However, it is widely criticized for its premature tread wear and inconsistent performance in wet or wintry conditions, leading to a low rate of repeat purchase among owners.

Pros

  • Satisfactory dry-road grip and handling
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Decent fuel efficiency
  • Predictable steering feedback under normal conditions

Cons

  • Significantly premature tread wear
  • Poor traction and instability in wet conditions
  • Unsafe performance in snow and icy environments
  • High price-to-longevity ratio

Observations

  • Users of Mazda CX-5 and CX-8 models frequently report the tire reaching the end of its service life between 20,000 and 30,000 kilometers.
  • Some owners noted structural issues such as premature cracking or bursting of the sidewalls within 20,000 miles of use.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Yokohama

Winner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 86 vs 49 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 93 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 80 vs 68 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 73 vs 67 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2
Tire B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.