Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 vs Yokohama Geolandar G98A — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 67 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 74 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 67 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 67 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 61 |
Noise
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 49 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 68 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | Yokohama Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 62 |
| Dry | 75 | 74 |
| Wet | 73 | 67 |
| Snow | 71 | – |
| Comfort | 93 | 61 |
| Noise | 90 | – |
| Treadwear | 86 | 49 |
| Handling | 80 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 is widely regarded as a durable, high-mileage tire that excels in dry and wet road conditions while offering respectable light off-road capability. While many users praise its quiet ride and longevity, some report a noticeable decline in comfort and increased noise levels in cold temperatures or on rougher road surfaces.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and high mileage capability
- Strong traction on dry and wet pavement
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on standard roads
- Capable performance on light off-road surfaces like gravel and sand
Cons
- Harsh ride and increased noise on rough or damaged road surfaces
- Poor performance in deep snow and icy conditions
- Stiff sidewalls can feel uncomfortable at low speeds
- Limited effectiveness in deep mud
Observations
- Users with SUVs like the Peugeot 3008 and 5008 report the tire is well-suited for highway and town driving but can feel harsh on uneven terrain.
- Pickup truck owners, such as those with the Nissan Navara, frequently highlight the tire's impressive durability and high-mileage lifespan under heavier loads.
- Drivers of high-torque vehicles noted improved traction and reduced wheel spin compared to OEM alternatives like the Bridgestone Dueler H/T.
The Yokohama Geolandar G98A is generally regarded as a mediocre OEM tire that provides acceptable dry-road handling and comfort for daily commuting. However, it is widely criticized for its premature tread wear and inconsistent performance in wet or wintry conditions, leading to a low rate of repeat purchase among owners.
Pros
- Satisfactory dry-road grip and handling
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Decent fuel efficiency
- Predictable steering feedback under normal conditions
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear
- Poor traction and instability in wet conditions
- Unsafe performance in snow and icy environments
- High price-to-longevity ratio
Observations
- Users of Mazda CX-5 and CX-8 models frequently report the tire reaching the end of its service life between 20,000 and 30,000 kilometers.
- Some owners noted structural issues such as premature cracking or bursting of the sidewalls within 20,000 miles of use.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 | B · Yokohama Geolandar G98A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Yokohama
Winner: Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 86 vs 49 on treadwear.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 93 vs 61 on comfort.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 80 vs 68 on handling.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX 2 scores 73 vs 67 on wet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.