78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Continental ContiCrossContact LX — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
35 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better snow, handling and wet. Pick the Continental ContiCrossContact LX if noise matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | ContiCrossContact LX |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 79 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | ContiCrossContact LX |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 65 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | ContiCrossContact LX |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 54 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | ContiCrossContact LX |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 67 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
ContiCrossContact LX leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | ContiCrossContact LX |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | ContiCrossContact LX |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 57 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | ContiCrossContact LX |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 62 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Continental ContiCrossContact LX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 73 |
| Dry | 88 | 83 |
| Wet | 83 | 73 |
| Snow | 81 | 64 |
| Comfort | 83 | 76 |
| Noise | 80 | 90 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 66 |
| Handling | 74 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
73
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Continental ContiCrossContact LX receives highly polarized feedback, often serving as a polarizing factory-fitted OEM tire. While some users praise its dry-road handling, quiet ride, and value, a significant portion of owners report severe dissatisfaction regarding wet-weather traction, hydroplaning, and inconsistent tread life.
Pros
- Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
- Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives
- Good initial feedback and steering response
Cons
- Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
- Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
- Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
- Lack of confidence in winter or slushy conditions
Observations
- Owners of modern SUVs like the Volvo XC60 and Jeep Cherokee frequently report dissatisfaction with the tire's longevity and wet-weather safety when fitted as OEM equipment.
- Long-term durability appears highly variable, with some users reporting 60,000km+ of life while others experience failure or significant wear before 20,000 miles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Continental ContiCrossContact LX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 800 A A | 680 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
73
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better snow, handling and wet. Pick the Continental ContiCrossContact LX if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 81 vs 64 on snow.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 74 vs 62 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 83 vs 73 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Continental ContiCrossContact LX scores 90 vs 80 on noise.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Continental ContiCrossContact LX
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Continental ContiCrossContact LX also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.