82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
43 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 vs Kumho Ecsta PS71 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
77
/ 100
Objective (60%)
84/100
13 professional tests
User signal (40%)
77/100
84 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — better comfort, dry and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS71 if wet matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiMaxContact MC5 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC5 | Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 85 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PS71 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC5 | Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiMaxContact MC5 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC5 | Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 74 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 73 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC5 | Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 92 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiMaxContact MC5 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC5 | Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 71 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiMaxContact MC5 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | ContiMaxContact MC5 | Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 79 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 77 |
| Dry | 88 | 81 |
| Wet | 80 | 83 |
| Comfort | 86 | 74 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 71 |
| Handling | 80 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
77
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in noise reduction and ride quality. While it offers impressive dry and wet grip for daily driving and spirited maneuvers, it is generally categorized as a balanced all-rounder rather than a dedicated track-focused performance tire.
Pros
- Exceptional cabin noise reduction and quiet operation
- High level of ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium performance rivals
- Reliable dry and wet weather traction for daily use
Cons
- Tread wear can be rapid when subjected to aggressive or spirited driving
- Sidewalls are relatively soft, which may feel less progressive at the absolute limit
- Reports of increased puncture susceptibility once tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent wet weather performance reported by a minority of users
Observations
- Users frequently report significant noise reduction when replacing factory-fitted tires on mid-sized sedans like the Honda Civic and Mazda 6.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines (e.g., Ford Falcon XR6) noted faster wear on rear tires compared to fronts.
- The tire is noted for improving ride quality on vehicles previously fitted with stiffer, performance-oriented rubber.
The Kumho Ecsta PS71 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers impressive wet and dry grip, often rivaling more expensive premium brands. While most users praise its handling and affordability, a subset of owners reports significant issues with road noise, inconsistent manufacturing quality, and occasional balancing difficulties.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry traction
- High value-for-money proposition
- Predictable handling and cornering feedback
- Strong aquaplaning resistance
Cons
- Reports of road noise and droning at highway speeds
- Inconsistent manufacturing quality (balancing issues and 'egg-shaped' tires)
- Soft sidewall construction leading to a 'floaty' or unstable feel for some drivers
- Variable tread life depending on vehicle type and driving style
Observations
- Users with high-torque RWD vehicles (e.g., BMW, Jaguar) generally report high satisfaction with grip levels, though some note faster rear-tire wear.
- Owners of smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., MX-5) occasionally report a 'floaty' sensation due to tread block movement, which can be unsettling during spirited driving.
- Some users on larger rim sizes (19-20 inch) report increased road noise and sensitivity to road imperfections.
Community buzz
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Ecsta PS71
Community discussions regarding the Kumho Ecsta PS71 generally present it as a solid, budget-friendly ultra-high-performance (UHP) summer tire offering good value, though opinions on its limits vary. Some users praise its handling transformations and decent wet/dry grip for spirited driving, while others note it feels merely adequate or mediocre until warmed up, preferring premium alternatives when budget permits.
r/tires
·5 upvotes ·2022-10-17
“Those are Kumho Ecsta PS71s, thread width is supposed to be 245mm, the actual one is hardly 235. How so?”
r/TyreReviews
·3 upvotes ·2026-03-08
“Between those I'd go with the Premiumcontact 7 or the ZE320 if you want to save some money. The continental seems to be serious competition for premium UHP tyres, afaik it gets similar results to the PS5 in tests. I wouldn't touch any of the sporty tyres mentioned, except for the PS71 which I still wouldn't take over the Continental.”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2024-10-25
“I've had the PS71 several years ago - it was ok, nothing spectacular. They might have changed the compound now, so it may be better. Its a good tire, I don't remember any real weaknesses, it just never felt like "yeah, this sticks like glue to the road". Edit: I just remembered - it was mediocre in the city - when the tire was not warmed up, but I reckon this is shared between most sport tires with high speed rating. Once warmed up was good.”
r/TeslaUK
·2 upvotes ·2026-08-28
“go with Kumho Ecsta PS71 EV around £140 – £165. Good value for money”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Tire wear and longevity#UHP performance characteristics#Comparison with premium brands#Sidewall width and markings#Tire pressure management
Based on 19 community posts
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 | B · Kumho Ecsta PS71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Continental
77
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 — better comfort, dry and treadwear. Pick the Kumho Ecsta PS71 if wet matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 86 vs 74 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 88 vs 81 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 scores 78 vs 71 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta PS71 scores 83 vs 80 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC5
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PS71
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiMaxContact MC5 also compared with
Kumho Ecsta PS71 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.