Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 39 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Too close to call: ContiMaxContact MC6 and ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun are level at 72.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 20 tests Owners 68 · 1,235 reviews
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +174Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) – 78 Reviews found online 79 69 -
73
Wet
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +679Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) – 84 Reviews found online 74 72 -
69
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +465Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) – 65 Reviews found online 70 65 -
–
Noise
No comparison67Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) – 67 -
65
Treadwear
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +469Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Professional tests (TWG score) – 72 Reviews found online 64 65 -
77
Handling
ContiMaxContact MC6 +968Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun Reviews found online 77 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 72 |
| Dry | 75 | 74 |
| Wet | 73 | 79 |
| Comfort | 69 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 69 |
| Handling | 77 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
ContiMaxContact MC6
72
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
72
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Too close to call: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 and Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is stronger on handling and comfort. Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is stronger on wet and treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 77 vs 68 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 73 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 69 vs 65 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.