Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 40 reviews
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Yokohama BluEarth E70 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, 71–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 16 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1659Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 78 54 -
72
Wet
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1161Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 72 58 -
70
Comfort
ContiMaxContact MC6 +1555Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 70 40 -
65
Treadwear
ContiMaxContact MC6 +263Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 64 61 -
76
Handling
ContiMaxContact MC6 +2452Why this score
Source ContiMaxContact MC6 BluEarth E70 Reviews found online 76 52
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | Yokohama BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 59 |
| Dry | 75 | 59 |
| Wet | 72 | 61 |
| Comfort | 70 | 55 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 63 |
| Handling | 76 | 52 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiMaxContact MC6
BluEarth E70
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Direct and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
Tire B BluEarth E70
Pros
- Excellent tread life and durability
- Predictable handling in dry conditions
- Strong fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
Cons
- High levels of cabin noise on various road surfaces
- Harsh ride quality and lack of comfort
- Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 | B · Yokohama BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Yokohama BluEarth E70
Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 52 on handling.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 75 vs 59 on dry.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 70 vs 55 on comfort.
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 72 vs 61 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.