Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Yokohama BluEarth E70 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

ContiMaxContact MC6 is ahead, 71–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +16
    59
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6BluEarth E70
    Reviews found online7854
  2. 72

    Wet

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +11
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6BluEarth E70
    Reviews found online7258
  3. 70

    Comfort

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +15
    55
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6BluEarth E70
    Reviews found online7040
  4. 65

    Treadwear

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +2
    63
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6BluEarth E70
    Reviews found online6461
  5. 76

    Handling

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +24
    52
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6BluEarth E70
    Reviews found online7652
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Yokohama BluEarth E70: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiMaxContact MC6Yokohama BluEarth E70
Relative Score 71 59
Dry 75 59
Wet 72 61
Comfort 70 55
Treadwear 65 63
Handling 76 52

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiMaxContact MC6

BluEarth E70

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Direct and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC6 review

Tire B BluEarth E70

Pros

  • Excellent tread life and durability
  • Predictable handling in dry conditions
  • Strong fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance

Cons

  • High levels of cabin noise on various road surfaces
  • Harsh ride quality and lack of comfort
  • Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction
All owner themes in the BluEarth E70 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 B · Yokohama BluEarth E70
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

Yokohama BluEarth E70

Winner: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 76 vs 52 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 75 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 70 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 72 vs 61 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth E70

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Leads

ContiMaxContact MC6

Amazon