Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 10 reviews
Continental ContiProContact SSR vs Continental PureContact LS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
PureContact LS is ahead, 66–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 9 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
62
Dry
PureContact LS +668Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR PureContact LS Reviews found online 59 68 -
63
Wet
PureContact LS +568Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR PureContact LS Reviews found online 62 68 -
61
Snow
Level61Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR PureContact LS Reviews found online 56 55 -
59
Comfort
PureContact LS +463Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR PureContact LS Reviews found online 49 57 -
64
Noise
PureContact LS +165Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR PureContact LS Reviews found online 61 63 -
62
Treadwear
PureContact LS +264Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR PureContact LS Reviews found online 59 62 -
54
Handling
PureContact LS +1569Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR PureContact LS Reviews found online 54 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiProContact SSR | Continental PureContact LS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 66 |
| Dry | 62 | 68 |
| Wet | 63 | 68 |
| Snow | 61 | 61 |
| Comfort | 59 | 63 |
| Noise | 64 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 64 |
| Handling | 54 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiProContact SSR
PureContact LS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiProContact SSR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B PureContact LS
Pros
- Good dry and wet handling
- Enhanced treadlife compared to sportier alternatives
- Comfortable ride with good vibration isolation
Cons
- Poor winter traction, particularly on snow and ice
- Morning flat-spotting causing noticeable vibrations for the first few miles
- Loud road noise and constant hum reported by certain drivers
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiProContact SSR | B · Continental PureContact LS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 A A | 700 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiProContact SSR
Continental PureContact LS
Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental PureContact LS scores 69 vs 54 on handling.
Continental PureContact LS scores 68 vs 62 on dry.
Continental PureContact LS scores 68 vs 63 on wet.
Continental PureContact LS scores 63 vs 59 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.