Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental ContiProContact vs Kumho Ecsta PA51 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Ecsta PA51

All Season Ultra High Performance tires

Kumho Ecsta PA51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
68/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
91/100
108 owner reviews
Dry
79
Wet
86
Snow
76
Comfort
50
Noise
90
Treadwear
90
Handling
91
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictOnly Kumho Ecsta PA51 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
79
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEcsta PA51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 69
Tire Rack owners 80 89
Tyre Reviews owners – 75
SimpleTire owners 96 98
America's Tire owners – 94

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
86
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEcsta PA51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 85
Tire Rack owners 73 84
Tyre Reviews owners – 58
SimpleTire owners 91 98
America's Tire owners – 89

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
76
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEcsta PA51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 74
Tire Rack owners 51 63
Tyre Reviews owners – 60
SimpleTire owners 88 88

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
50
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEcsta PA51
Professional tests (TWG score) – 23
Tire Rack owners 75 82
Tyre Reviews owners – 63
SimpleTire owners 93 93
America's Tire owners – 92

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
90
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEcsta PA51
SimpleTire owners 92 96
America's Tire owners – 89

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
90
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEcsta PA51
Tire Rack owners 63 79
Tyre Reviews owners – 85
SimpleTire owners 87 94
America's Tire owners – 90

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
–
B
91
Why this score
SourceContiProContactEcsta PA51
Tyre Reviews owners – 75
America's Tire owners – 92

Scores at a glance

CategoryContinental ContiProContactKumho Ecsta PA51
Relative Score – 82
Dry – 79
Wet – 86
Snow – 76
Comfort – 50
Noise – 90
Treadwear – 90
Handling – 91

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiProContact

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Kumho Ecsta PA51

The Kumho Ecsta PA51 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance all-season tire that delivers impressive dry grip and ride comfort at a competitive price point. While the vast majority of users report satisfaction with its handling and noise levels, a small minority of drivers find its wet-weather performance and noise characteristics lacking compared to premium-tier alternatives.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Attractive sidewall aesthetics
  • Consistent, even tread wear over long-term use

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
  • Some reports of increased road noise over time
  • Limited availability in certain niche sizes
  • Occasional traction loss under hard acceleration

Observations

  • Users with performance-oriented sedans (e.g., Acura TL, Infiniti G35x) report that the tire effectively manages power delivery and provides a significant upgrade over worn OEM tires.
  • Owners of daily drivers and SUVs frequently praise the tire's longevity and comfort, noting it performs well for suburban and highway commuting.
  • Some users noted that while the tire is excellent for general use, it may not meet the extreme performance expectations of high-horsepower sports cars compared to top-tier dedicated performance tires.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiProContact B · Kumho Ecsta PA51
Category—All Season Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available5613
Rim diameters15″ – 19″16″ – 19″
Tread depth9 - 12/32″10.5/32″
UTQG400 - 540 A - AA A500 A A
Treadwear warranty—45,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Kumho

Only Kumho Ecsta PA51 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental ContiProContact
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta PA51
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.