81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
68/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
91/100
108 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Kumho Ecsta PA51 vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta PA51 — better snow, treadwear and handling. Pick the Kumho Solus TA31 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PA51 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PA51 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 69 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 89 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 74 |
| SimpleTire owners | 98 | – |
| America's Tire owners | 94 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PA51 leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PA51 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 63 |
| SimpleTire owners | 98 | – |
| America's Tire owners | 89 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PA51 leads by 32
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PA51 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 74 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 63 | 57 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 43 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Solus TA31 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PA51 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 23 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 82 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 63 | 73 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
| America's Tire owners | 92 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PA51 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 96 | – |
| America's Tire owners | 89 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PA51 leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PA51 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 79 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 61 |
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
| America's Tire owners | 90 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta PA51 leads by 27
Why this score
| Source | Ecsta PA51 | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 64 |
| America's Tire owners | 92 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecsta PA51 | Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 64 |
| Dry | 79 | 75 |
| Wet | 86 | 64 |
| Snow | 76 | 44 |
| Comfort | 50 | 74 |
| Noise | 90 | – |
| Treadwear | 90 | 63 |
| Handling | 91 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecsta PA51 is widely regarded as a high-value, ultra-high-performance all-season tire that delivers impressive dry grip and ride comfort at a competitive price point. While the vast majority of users report satisfaction with its handling and noise levels, a small minority of drivers find its wet-weather performance and noise characteristics lacking compared to premium-tier alternatives.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- Strong dry pavement traction and cornering grip
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Attractive sidewall aesthetics
- Consistent, even tread wear over long-term use
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in heavy rain or standing water
- Some reports of increased road noise over time
- Limited availability in certain niche sizes
- Occasional traction loss under hard acceleration
Observations
- Users with performance-oriented sedans (e.g., Acura TL, Infiniti G35x) report that the tire effectively manages power delivery and provides a significant upgrade over worn OEM tires.
- Owners of daily drivers and SUVs frequently praise the tire's longevity and comfort, noting it performs well for suburban and highway commuting.
- Some users noted that while the tire is excellent for general use, it may not meet the extreme performance expectations of high-horsepower sports cars compared to top-tier dedicated performance tires.
The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Strong value for money
- Attractive aesthetic design
- Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving
Cons
- Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
- Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
- Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
- Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention
Observations
- Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
- Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecsta PA51 | B · Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 13 | 19 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10.5/32″ | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Kumho
64
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Ecsta PA51 — better snow, treadwear and handling. Pick the Kumho Solus TA31 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 76 vs 44 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 90 vs 63 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta PA51 scores 91 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Solus TA31 scores 74 vs 50 on comfort.
Tire A · Kumho Ecsta PA51
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecsta PA51 also compared with
Kumho Solus TA31 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.