Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 74 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 63 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 57 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 43 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 73 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 61 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 64 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 64 |
| Dry | 90 | 75 |
| Wet | 84 | 64 |
| Snow | 69 | 44 |
| Comfort | 87 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 63 |
| Handling | 90 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich G-Force COMP-2 A/S is widely regarded as a high-performance, value-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive OEM options. While users frequently praise its aggressive handling and confidence-inspiring grip, a significant portion of the feedback highlights concerns regarding road noise and shorter-than-expected tread life.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors.
- Responsive steering and stable cornering capabilities.
- Aggressive, sporty aesthetic that many owners appreciate.
Cons
- Noticeable road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'growl' that increases with wear.
- Tread life often falls short of expectations, with many users reporting premature wear.
- Tendency to develop vibrations or balance issues over time.
- Limited performance in deep snow or icy conditions despite being marketed as all-season.
Observations
- Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-horsepower RWD platforms (e.g., Dodge Charger, Mustang) report excellent grip but note faster rear tire wear.
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires to these standard tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Drivers of smaller, lighter cars (e.g., Miata, Civic) appreciate the handling improvements but sometimes find the tire's sidewall stiffness to be a trade-off for ride harshness.
The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.
Pros
- Low noise levels and high ride comfort
- Strong value for money
- Attractive aesthetic design
- Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving
Cons
- Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
- Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
- Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
- Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention
Observations
- Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
- Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S | B · Kumho Solus TA31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance All Season tire | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 19 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 AA A | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
Kumho
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better handling, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 64 on handling.
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 69 vs 44 on snow.
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 84 vs 64 on wet.
BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 81 vs 63 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.