Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

Ultra High Performance All Season tire

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
710 owner reviews
Dry
90
Wet
84
Snow
69
Comfort
87
Treadwear
81
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Solus TA31

All Season Premium Touring tires

Kumho Solus TA31 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
59/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
75
Wet
64
Snow
44
Comfort
74
Treadwear
63
Handling
64

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better handling, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 15
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
90
B — Kumho Solus TA31
75
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SSolus TA31
Professional tests (TWG score) 88
Tire Rack owners 85
Tyre Reviews owners 100 74

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 20
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
84
B — Kumho Solus TA31
64
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SSolus TA31
Professional tests (TWG score) 81
Tire Rack owners 77
Tyre Reviews owners 80 63

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 25
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
69
B — Kumho Solus TA31
44
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SSolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 57
Tyre Reviews owners 43

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 13
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
87
B — Kumho Solus TA31
74
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SSolus TA31
Professional tests (TWG score) 89
Tire Rack owners 78
Tyre Reviews owners 90 73

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 18
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
81
B — Kumho Solus TA31
63
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SSolus TA31
Tire Rack owners 78
Tyre Reviews owners 50 61

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) g-Force COMP-2 A/S leads by 26
A — BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
90
B — Kumho Solus TA31
64
Why this score
Sourceg-Force COMP-2 A/SSolus TA31
Tyre Reviews owners 90 64

Scores at a glance

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S vs Kumho Solus TA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/SKumho Solus TA31
Relative Score 83 64
Dry 90 75
Wet 84 64
Snow 69 44
Comfort 87 74
Treadwear 81 63
Handling 90 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S

The BFGoodrich G-Force COMP-2 A/S is widely regarded as a high-performance, value-oriented tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often outperforming more expensive OEM options. While users frequently praise its aggressive handling and confidence-inspiring grip, a significant portion of the feedback highlights concerns regarding road noise and shorter-than-expected tread life.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction that inspires driver confidence.
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors.
  • Responsive steering and stable cornering capabilities.
  • Aggressive, sporty aesthetic that many owners appreciate.

Cons

  • Noticeable road noise, often described as a 'hum' or 'growl' that increases with wear.
  • Tread life often falls short of expectations, with many users reporting premature wear.
  • Tendency to develop vibrations or balance issues over time.
  • Limited performance in deep snow or icy conditions despite being marketed as all-season.

Observations

  • Owners of heavier vehicles or those with high-horsepower RWD platforms (e.g., Dodge Charger, Mustang) report excellent grip but note faster rear tire wear.
  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to these standard tires consistently report a significant improvement in ride comfort and noise reduction.
  • Drivers of smaller, lighter cars (e.g., Miata, Civic) appreciate the handling improvements but sometimes find the tire's sidewall stiffness to be a trade-off for ride harshness.
Tire B Kumho Solus TA31

The Kumho Solus TA31 receives a polarized reception, with users divided between those who value its quiet ride and affordability and those who find its handling and longevity lacking. While some drivers report excellent value and high mileage, others express significant concerns regarding stability during emergency maneuvers and premature tread wear.

Pros

  • Low noise levels and high ride comfort
  • Strong value for money
  • Attractive aesthetic design
  • Reliable performance for conservative, daily driving

Cons

  • Unpredictable handling during emergency maneuvers
  • Concerns regarding premature or uneven tread wear
  • Poor stability control compared to premium competitors
  • Reports of inconsistent tire pressure retention

Observations

  • Users noted that low-profile versions of this tire appear more susceptible to accelerated wear.
  • Front-wheel-drive vehicle owners reported higher-than-average wear rates on the front axle.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S B · Kumho Solus TA31
CategoryUltra High Performance All Season tireAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available19
Rim diameters15″ – 20″
Tread depth9 - 10/32″9.5/32″
UTQG400 AA A500 A A
Treadwear warranty45,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi44 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

BFGoodrich

Kumho

Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S — better handling, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 90 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 69 vs 44 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 84 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S scores 81 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force COMP-2 A/S
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.