Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo vs Michelin Road 5 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Michelin

Michelin Road 5

Summer Premium Touring tires

Michelin Road 5 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
72/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
24 owner reviews
Dry
88
Wet
87
Comfort
89
Treadwear
83
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo — better dry, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo leads by 12
A — Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo
100
B — Michelin Road 5
88
Why this score
SourceContiRoadAttack 2 Gran TurismoRoad 5
Professional tests (TWG score) – 88
Tyre Reviews owners 100 87

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo leads by 3
A — Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo
90
B — Michelin Road 5
87
Why this score
SourceContiRoadAttack 2 Gran TurismoRoad 5
Tyre Reviews owners 90 87

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo leads by 11
A — Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo
100
B — Michelin Road 5
89
Why this score
SourceContiRoadAttack 2 Gran TurismoRoad 5
Tyre Reviews owners 100 89

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo
–
B — Michelin Road 5
83
Why this score
SourceContiRoadAttack 2 Gran TurismoRoad 5
Tyre Reviews owners – 83

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo
–
B — Michelin Road 5
80
Why this score
SourceContiRoadAttack 2 Gran TurismoRoad 5
Tyre Reviews owners – 80

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo vs Michelin Road 5: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran TurismoMichelin Road 5
Relative Score 95 88
Dry 100 88
Wet 90 87
Comfort 100 89
Treadwear – 83
Handling – 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo

The Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo is highly regarded for its confidence-inspiring grip and performance across varied road conditions. While the initial break-in period requires caution due to a brief 'twitchy' sensation, the tire quickly settles into a stable and reliable profile suitable for sport-touring applications.

Pros

  • High levels of confidence in both dry and wet conditions
  • Excellent grip performance on varied road surfaces
  • Quick transition to stable handling after the initial scrub-in period

Cons

  • Noticeable instability or 'twitchy' handling during the first 30-50 miles of use
  • Requires a dedicated break-in process before reaching optimal performance

Observations

  • Reported effective performance on sport-oriented motorcycles like the Kawasaki ZX-9R
  • Well-suited for daily commuting on diverse A and B-road environments
Tire B Michelin Road 5

The Michelin Road 5 is widely regarded as a benchmark sport-touring tire, praised for its exceptional wet-weather performance and impressive longevity. While most riders report high confidence in both dry and wet conditions, a significant subset of users has expressed frustration regarding the tire's susceptibility to punctures, which some attribute to its soft carcass and siping design.

Pros

  • Class-leading wet weather grip and rider confidence
  • Excellent tread life and durability for touring applications
  • Dual-compound construction provides a balance of stability and cornering grip
  • Strong performance across diverse riding styles, including occasional track use

Cons

  • High susceptibility to punctures from road debris
  • Soft carcass construction can be prone to structural damage from impacts
  • Some users report a lack of feedback compared to dedicated sport tires
  • Premium price point compared to competitors

Observations

  • Users on torquey middleweight bikes (e.g., 650cc-765cc) report excellent traction and longevity, even under aggressive riding.
  • Heavier sport-touring machines (e.g., K1300R, VFR800) benefit from the tire's stability, though some note unique wear patterns on the front tire compared to the rear.
  • Commuters on poor-quality tarmac report high mileage but note that the tire's grip can be tested by extreme road surface conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo B · Michelin Road 5
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typeMotorcycleMotorcycle
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Michelin

Winner: Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo — better dry, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo scores 100 vs 88 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo scores 100 vs 89 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo scores 90 vs 87 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 2 Gran Turismo
Tire B · Michelin Road 5

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.