87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiSportAttack 3 vs Michelin Power 5 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
15 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiSportAttack 3 — better wet, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 3 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportAttack 3 | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 86 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 3 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportAttack 3 | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 81 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 3 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportAttack 3 | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 85 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 3 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportAttack 3 | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 72 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 3 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | ContiSportAttack 3 | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportAttack 3 | Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 87 | 80 |
| Dry | 90 | 86 |
| Wet | 90 | 81 |
| Comfort | 90 | 85 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 72 |
| Handling | 90 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
87
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiSportAttack 3 is highly regarded for its rapid warm-up characteristics and versatile grip across varying road conditions. Users consistently report strong performance in cold, wet, and compromised surface environments, though this performance comes at the cost of accelerated tread wear.
Pros
- Rapid warm-up time
- Exceptional grip in cold temperatures
- Strong performance on wet and dirty road surfaces
Cons
- Above-average tread wear rate
Observations
- Performance remains consistent across diverse road conditions, suggesting high versatility for sport-oriented riders.
The Michelin Power 5 is widely regarded as a high-performing street sport tire that excels in rapid warm-up, wet-weather confidence, and agile handling. While most riders praise its real-world versatility and grip, opinions on longevity and high-lean-angle stability are polarized, with some users preferring competitors like the Bridgestone S22 for track-oriented or aggressive riding.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and stability in standing water
- Rapid warm-up times, even in cooler ambient temperatures
- Agile handling and predictable cornering behavior on public roads
- Strong confidence-inspiring feedback during braking
Cons
- Tendency for the rear tire to square off prematurely
- Inconsistent performance and grip degradation as the tire reaches the end of its life
- Lack of confidence at maximum lean angles compared to dedicated track tires
- Mixed reports on overall mileage, with some users experiencing rapid wear under heavy engine braking
Observations
- Users on middleweight naked bikes like the KTM Duke 790 report excellent synergy and traction control performance.
- Riders with high-torque bikes featuring strong engine braking noted a 'sketchy' front-end feel and accelerated rear tire wear.
- Mileage reports vary significantly, ranging from 2,500 miles to over 8,000 miles depending on riding style and bike weight.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportAttack 3 | B · Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
87
/ 100
Continental
80
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Continental ContiSportAttack 3 — better wet, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiSportAttack 3 scores 90 vs 81 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSportAttack 3 scores 90 vs 81 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiSportAttack 3 scores 80 vs 72 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSportAttack 3 scores 90 vs 85 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ContiSportAttack 3
Tire B · Michelin Power 5
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiSportAttack 3 also compared with
Michelin Power 5 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.