82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Continental ContiSportAttack 3 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
87
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiSportAttack 3 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiSport Attack if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | ContiSportAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 90 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 3 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | ContiSportAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 90 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 3 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | ContiSportAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiSportAttack 3 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | ContiSportAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | ContiSportAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Continental ContiSportAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 87 |
| Dry | 94 | 90 |
| Wet | 74 | 90 |
| Comfort | 86 | 90 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 80 |
| Handling | 91 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
87
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiSport Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry-weather handling, cornering stability, and predictable feedback. While users consistently praise its track-capable grip and agility, there is a clear divide regarding longevity, with some riders experiencing rapid tread wear depending on bike weight and riding style.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
- Strong performance on track and spirited canyon riding
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Observations
- Lighter motorcycles like the Suzuki SV650 report significantly better mileage (up to 12,500km front) compared to high-output sportbikes like the ZX10R.
- Users noted that the tire's performance profile is better suited for canyon carving and track use than for high-mileage commuting.
The Continental ContiSportAttack 3 is highly regarded for its rapid warm-up characteristics and versatile grip across varying road conditions. Users consistently report strong performance in cold, wet, and compromised surface environments, though this performance comes at the cost of accelerated tread wear.
Pros
- Rapid warm-up time
- Exceptional grip in cold temperatures
- Strong performance on wet and dirty road surfaces
Cons
- Above-average tread wear rate
Observations
- Performance remains consistent across diverse road conditions, suggesting high versatility for sport-oriented riders.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Continental ContiSportAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Continental
87
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental ContiSportAttack 3 — better wet, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiSport Attack if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiSportAttack 3 scores 90 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiSportAttack 3 scores 80 vs 74 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 94 vs 90 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSportAttack 3 scores 90 vs 86 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ContiSport Attack
Tire B · Continental ContiSportAttack 3
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiSport Attack also compared with
Continental ContiSportAttack 3 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.