84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
83/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 vs Continental ContiSport Attack — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 — better wet and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiSport Attack if dry, treadwear and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Battlax Sport Touring T32 | ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 94 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Battlax Sport Touring T32 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Battlax Sport Touring T32 | ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 74 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Battlax Sport Touring T32 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Battlax Sport Touring T32 | ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Battlax Sport Touring T32 | ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 74 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Battlax Sport Touring T32 | ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 91 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | Continental ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 82 |
| Dry | 86 | 94 |
| Wet | 90 | 74 |
| Comfort | 93 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 74 |
| Handling | 88 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 is widely regarded as a high-performance touring tire that excels in wet-weather confidence and handling agility. While most riders praise its stability and transformative effect on bike handling, there is a notable consensus regarding its relatively short tread life and occasional concerns about rear-end grip during aggressive dry-weather riding.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather performance and rider confidence
- Noticeable improvement in handling and steering agility
- High-speed stability even when carrying heavy luggage
- Consistent performance across a wide range of temperatures
Cons
- Disappointing tread longevity, particularly for heavy touring bikes
- Reports of rear-end sliding during aggressive dry-weather cornering
- Noticeable drop-off in performance as the tire reaches the end of its life
Observations
- Riders of heavy touring motorcycles, such as the BMW R1200RT, report significantly faster rear tire wear compared to previous generation tires.
- The T32GT variant is specifically noted for providing lighter, more responsive steering compared to competitor tires on heavy touring platforms.
The Continental ContiSport Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry-weather handling, cornering stability, and predictable feedback. While users consistently praise its track-capable grip and agility, there is a clear divide regarding longevity, with some riders experiencing rapid tread wear depending on bike weight and riding style.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
- Strong performance on track and spirited canyon riding
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Observations
- Lighter motorcycles like the Suzuki SV650 report significantly better mileage (up to 12,500km front) compared to high-output sportbikes like the ZX10R.
- Users noted that the tire's performance profile is better suited for canyon carving and track use than for high-mileage commuting.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | B · Continental ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
84
/ 100
Bridgestone
82
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 — better wet and comfort. Pick the Continental ContiSport Attack if dry, treadwear and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 scores 90 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 94 vs 86 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 scores 93 vs 86 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 74 vs 69 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32
Tire B · Continental ContiSport Attack
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 also compared with
Continental ContiSport Attack also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.