82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
84/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Michelin Power 5 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
15 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ContiSport Attack — better handling and dry. Pick the Michelin Power 5 if wet matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 86 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Power 5 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 81 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 85 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 72 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ContiSport Attack leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ContiSport Attack | Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 80 |
| Dry | 94 | 86 |
| Wet | 74 | 81 |
| Comfort | 86 | 85 |
| Treadwear | 74 | 72 |
| Handling | 91 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiSport Attack is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that excels in dry-weather handling, cornering stability, and predictable feedback. While users consistently praise its track-capable grip and agility, there is a clear divide regarding longevity, with some riders experiencing rapid tread wear depending on bike weight and riding style.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
- Strong performance on track and spirited canyon riding
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Observations
- Lighter motorcycles like the Suzuki SV650 report significantly better mileage (up to 12,500km front) compared to high-output sportbikes like the ZX10R.
- Users noted that the tire's performance profile is better suited for canyon carving and track use than for high-mileage commuting.
The Michelin Power 5 is widely regarded as a high-performing street sport tire that excels in rapid warm-up, wet-weather confidence, and agile handling. While most riders praise its real-world versatility and grip, opinions on longevity and high-lean-angle stability are polarized, with some users preferring competitors like the Bridgestone S22 for track-oriented or aggressive riding.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and stability in standing water
- Rapid warm-up times, even in cooler ambient temperatures
- Agile handling and predictable cornering behavior on public roads
- Strong confidence-inspiring feedback during braking
Cons
- Tendency for the rear tire to square off prematurely
- Inconsistent performance and grip degradation as the tire reaches the end of its life
- Lack of confidence at maximum lean angles compared to dedicated track tires
- Mixed reports on overall mileage, with some users experiencing rapid wear under heavy engine braking
Observations
- Users on middleweight naked bikes like the KTM Duke 790 report excellent synergy and traction control performance.
- Riders with high-torque bikes featuring strong engine braking noted a 'sketchy' front-end feel and accelerated rear tire wear.
- Mileage reports vary significantly, ranging from 2,500 miles to over 8,000 miles depending on riding style and bike weight.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Ultra High Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Continental
80
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Continental ContiSport Attack — better handling and dry. Pick the Michelin Power 5 if wet matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 91 vs 81 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 94 vs 86 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Power 5 scores 81 vs 74 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ContiSport Attack
Tire B · Michelin Power 5
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ContiSport Attack also compared with
Michelin Power 5 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.