Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental ContiSportAttack 3 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V103 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan Sport V103

Summer Ultra High Performance tires

Yokohama Advan Sport V103 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
16 owner reviews
Dry
92
Wet
88
Comfort
86
Treadwear
75
Handling
93

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Continental ContiSportAttack 3 and Yokohama Advan Sport V103 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSportAttack 3 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Yokohama Advan Sport V103 is stronger on handling.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport V103 leads by 2
A — Continental ContiSportAttack 3
90
B — Yokohama Advan Sport V103
92
Why this score
SourceContiSportAttack 3Advan Sport V103
Tyre Reviews owners 90 98

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiSportAttack 3 leads by 2
A — Continental ContiSportAttack 3
90
B — Yokohama Advan Sport V103
88
Why this score
SourceContiSportAttack 3Advan Sport V103
Tyre Reviews owners 90 95

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiSportAttack 3 leads by 4
A — Continental ContiSportAttack 3
90
B — Yokohama Advan Sport V103
86
Why this score
SourceContiSportAttack 3Advan Sport V103
Tyre Reviews owners 90 95

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiSportAttack 3 leads by 5
A — Continental ContiSportAttack 3
80
B — Yokohama Advan Sport V103
75
Why this score
SourceContiSportAttack 3Advan Sport V103
Tyre Reviews owners 80 85

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Sport V103 leads by 3
A — Continental ContiSportAttack 3
90
B — Yokohama Advan Sport V103
93
Why this score
SourceContiSportAttack 3Advan Sport V103
Tyre Reviews owners 90 93

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiSportAttack 3 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V103: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportAttack 3Yokohama Advan Sport V103
Relative Score 87 86
Dry 90 92
Wet 90 88
Comfort 90 86
Treadwear 80 75
Handling 90 93

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiSportAttack 3

The Continental ContiSportAttack 3 is highly regarded for its rapid warm-up characteristics and versatile grip across varying road conditions. Users consistently report strong performance in cold, wet, and compromised surface environments, though this performance comes at the cost of accelerated tread wear.

Pros

  • Rapid warm-up time
  • Exceptional grip in cold temperatures
  • Strong performance on wet and dirty road surfaces

Cons

  • Above-average tread wear rate

Observations

  • Performance remains consistent across diverse road conditions, suggesting high versatility for sport-oriented riders.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Sport V103

The Yokohama Advan Sport V103 is widely regarded as a capable performance tire that offers a compelling balance of dry grip, ride comfort, and low road noise. While many users praise its handling characteristics and value—particularly when purchased as discounted older stock—opinions on tread longevity are polarized, with some reporting rapid wear under spirited driving or track conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather grip and cornering stability
  • High levels of ride comfort and minimal road noise
  • Strong value proposition, especially when found as clearance or 'new old stock' inventory
  • Progressive handling characteristics at the limit

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Reports of diminished performance in cool or wet conditions as the tire ages
  • Potential for rapid degradation when subjected to track-day usage
  • Some users report significant loss of grip once the tread depth reaches critical levels

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires to the V103 reported a noticeable improvement in ride quality and comfort.
  • Drivers of high-torque vehicles or those with aggressive chassis setups (e.g., increased camber) noted varying results in tread longevity, suggesting the tire is sensitive to alignment and driving style.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportAttack 3 B · Yokohama Advan Sport V103
CategorySummer Max Performance tiresSummer Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle typeMotorcyclePassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Yokohama

Too close to call: Continental ContiSportAttack 3 and Yokohama Advan Sport V103 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSportAttack 3 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Yokohama Advan Sport V103 is stronger on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiSportAttack 3 scores 80 vs 75 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiSportAttack 3 scores 90 vs 86 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Sport V103 scores 93 vs 90 on handling.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportAttack 3
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport V103

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.