Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports

Summer Premium Touring tires

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports tread pattern
Objective (60%)
63/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
76/100
5 owner reviews
Dry
72
Wet
86
Comfort
37
Noise
Treadwear
80
Handling
65

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental ContiSportContact 3 — better comfort, handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports if treadwear and wet matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 3 leads by 15
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
87
B — Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
72
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Professional tests (TWG score) 63
Tire Rack owners 87
Tyre Reviews owners 85

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus HS51 Harmony Sports leads by 7
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
79
B — Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
86
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Professional tests (TWG score) 90
Tire Rack owners 78
Tyre Reviews owners 80

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 3 leads by 38
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
75
B — Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
37
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Professional tests (TWG score) 1
Tire Rack owners 75
Tyre Reviews owners 90

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
71
B — Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus HS51 Harmony Sports leads by 18
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
62
B — Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
80
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Tire Rack owners 62
Tyre Reviews owners 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 3 leads by 20
A — Continental ContiSportContact 3
85
B — Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
65
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Tyre Reviews owners 65

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 3Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Relative Score 76 71
Dry 87 72
Wet 79 86
Comfort 75 37
Noise 71
Treadwear 62 80
Handling 85 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiSportContact 3

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports

The Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports presents a polarizing experience, often praised for its comfort and value in general driving, yet criticized for significant handling instability in specific applications. While some users find them to be a superb mid-range upgrade, others report a disconcerting 'jelly-like' sidewall flex that severely compromises steering precision and dry grip.

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Strong wet weather performance
  • Improved handling characteristics for van applications

Cons

  • Excessive sidewall softness leading to a 'wobbling' or unstable sensation
  • Noticeable decline in grip levels before the tread is fully worn
  • Inconsistent handling performance depending on axle placement
  • Limited durability under spirited driving conditions

Observations

  • Lightweight vehicles, such as the Mazda MX-5, appear particularly sensitive to the tire's soft sidewall, resulting in reported handling instability.
  • Users noted that the tire's performance characteristics are highly dependent on axle placement, with some experiencing 'dead' steering or lurching depending on front versus rear fitment.
  • The tire is reported to perform well in van applications, specifically benefiting from higher load and speed ratings compared to competitors.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 3 B · Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
CategorySummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9 - 10/32″
UTQG280 A - B A
SidewallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Kumho

Winner: Continental ContiSportContact 3 — better comfort, handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports if treadwear and wet matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiSportContact 3 scores 75 vs 37 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiSportContact 3 scores 85 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports scores 80 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiSportContact 3 scores 87 vs 72 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 3
Tire B · Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.