Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports

Summer Premium Touring tires

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports tread pattern
Objective (60%)
63/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
76/100
5 owner reviews
Dry
72
Wet
86
Comfort
37
Treadwear
80
Handling
65

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Summer Premium Touring tires

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Dry
83
Wet
78
Comfort
86
Treadwear
75
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better comfort, handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports if wet and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 11
A — Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
72
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
83
Why this score
SourceSolus HS51 Harmony SportsBluEarth Es ES32
Professional tests (TWG score) 63
Tyre Reviews owners 85 83

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus HS51 Harmony Sports leads by 8
A — Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
86
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
78
Why this score
SourceSolus HS51 Harmony SportsBluEarth Es ES32
Professional tests (TWG score) 90
Tyre Reviews owners 80 78

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 49
A — Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
37
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
86
Why this score
SourceSolus HS51 Harmony SportsBluEarth Es ES32
Professional tests (TWG score) 1
Tyre Reviews owners 90 86

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Solus HS51 Harmony Sports leads by 5
A — Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
80
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
75
Why this score
SourceSolus HS51 Harmony SportsBluEarth Es ES32
Tyre Reviews owners 80 75

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 16
A — Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
65
B — Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
81
Why this score
SourceSolus HS51 Harmony SportsBluEarth Es ES32
Tyre Reviews owners 65 81

Scores at a glance

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus HS51 Harmony SportsYokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 71 80
Dry 72 83
Wet 86 78
Comfort 37 86
Treadwear 80 75
Handling 65 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports

The Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports presents a polarizing experience, often praised for its comfort and value in general driving, yet criticized for significant handling instability in specific applications. While some users find them to be a superb mid-range upgrade, others report a disconcerting 'jelly-like' sidewall flex that severely compromises steering precision and dry grip.

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Strong wet weather performance
  • Improved handling characteristics for van applications

Cons

  • Excessive sidewall softness leading to a 'wobbling' or unstable sensation
  • Noticeable decline in grip levels before the tread is fully worn
  • Inconsistent handling performance depending on axle placement
  • Limited durability under spirited driving conditions

Observations

  • Lightweight vehicles, such as the Mazda MX-5, appear particularly sensitive to the tire's soft sidewall, resulting in reported handling instability.
  • Users noted that the tire's performance characteristics are highly dependent on axle placement, with some experiencing 'dead' steering or lurching depending on front versus rear fitment.
  • The tire is reported to perform well in van applications, specifically benefiting from higher load and speed ratings compared to competitors.
Tire B Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
  • Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
  • Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving

Observations

  • Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
  • Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
  • Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummer Premium Touring tiresSummer Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Yokohama

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better comfort, handling and dry. Pick the Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports if wet and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 86 vs 37 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 81 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 83 vs 72 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports scores 86 vs 78 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.