Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 27 reviews
Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is ahead, 82–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 18 tests Owners 79 · 3,577 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2085Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 84 Reviews found online 62 85 -
68
Wet
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2189Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 92 Reviews found online 67 84 -
66
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Reviews found online 63 – -
63
Comfort
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +1780Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 85 Reviews found online 57 73 -
66
Noise
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +672Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 76 Reviews found online 67 67 -
53
Treadwear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +2477Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 82 Reviews found online 44 71 -
52
Handling
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 +3082Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Reviews found online 52 82
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 5 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 82 |
| Dry | 65 | 85 |
| Wet | 68 | 89 |
| Snow | 66 | – |
| Comfort | 63 | 80 |
| Noise | 66 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 77 |
| Handling | 52 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
ContiSportContact 5
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportContact 5
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Precise steering response and high-speed stability
- Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
- Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 30 | 16 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 18″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 8 - 10/32″ | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 - 420 A - AA A | 300 - 500 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportContact 5
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 82 vs 52 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 77 vs 53 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 89 vs 68 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 scores 85 vs 65 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.