Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Michelin Primacy MXM4 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Michelin

Michelin Primacy MXM4

All Season Premium Touring tires

Michelin Primacy MXM4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
70
Snow
51
Comfort
66
Noise
–
Treadwear
79
Handling
64

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Michelin Primacy MXM4 — better treadwear. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 if handling, comfort and dry matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 5 leads by 6
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
83
B — Michelin Primacy MXM4
77
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Primacy MXM4
Tire Rack owners 87 88
Tyre Reviews owners – 76
SimpleTire owners 99 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 5 leads by 4
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
74
B — Michelin Primacy MXM4
70
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Primacy MXM4
Tire Rack owners 81 85
Tyre Reviews owners – 68
SimpleTire owners 98 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
–
B — Michelin Primacy MXM4
51
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Primacy MXM4
Tire Rack owners – 60
Tyre Reviews owners – 50
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 5 leads by 8
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
74
B — Michelin Primacy MXM4
66
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Primacy MXM4
Tire Rack owners 80 84
Tyre Reviews owners – 64
SimpleTire owners 97 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
72
B — Michelin Primacy MXM4
–
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Primacy MXM4
SimpleTire owners 98 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Primacy MXM4 leads by 34
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
45
B — Michelin Primacy MXM4
79
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Primacy MXM4
Tire Rack owners 56 73
Tyre Reviews owners – 80
SimpleTire owners 92 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ContiSportContact 5 leads by 19
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
83
B — Michelin Primacy MXM4
64
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Primacy MXM4
Tyre Reviews owners – 64

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Michelin Primacy MXM4: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5Michelin Primacy MXM4
Relative Score 69 72
Dry 83 77
Wet 74 70
Snow – 51
Comfort 74 66
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 45 79
Handling 83 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiSportContact 5

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Michelin Primacy MXM4

The Michelin Primacy MXM4 is generally regarded as a comfort-oriented grand touring tire that excels in ride quality and tread longevity but falls short for performance-minded drivers. While users praise its ability to dampen road vibrations and maintain durability, many report lackluster handling, significant understeer, and underwhelming wet-weather traction when pushed.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
  • Strong tread life and durability
  • High fuel efficiency
  • Effective resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain

Cons

  • Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
  • Noticeable understeer when cornering
  • Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
  • Increased road noise on certain surfaces

Observations

  • Drivers of high-torque FWD vehicles report significant wheelspin and traction issues in wet conditions.
  • Tesla Model 3 owners noted a decline in handling performance compared to dedicated summer tires, suggesting the tire is better suited for comfort than spirited driving.
  • The tire's run-flat variants are noted for maintaining a surprisingly soft and compliant ride despite their reinforced construction.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 B · Michelin Primacy MXM4
Category—All Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available30—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth8 - 10/32″—
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Michelin

Winner: Michelin Primacy MXM4 — better treadwear. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 if handling, comfort and dry matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 79 vs 45 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 83 vs 64 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 74 vs 66 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 83 vs 77 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5
Tire B · Michelin Primacy MXM4

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.