71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
66/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Premier A/S vs Michelin Primacy MXM4 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Premier A/S — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Michelin Primacy MXM4 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Premier A/S leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Premier A/S | Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 76 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Premier A/S leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Premier A/S | Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 68 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Premier A/S leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Premier A/S | Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 60 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 50 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Premier A/S leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Premier A/S | Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 64 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Primacy MXM4 leads by 36
Why this score
| Source | Premier A/S | Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 73 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 43 | 80 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Premier A/S leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Premier A/S | Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 64 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Premier A/S | Michelin Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 69 |
| Dry | 90 | 77 |
| Wet | 86 | 70 |
| Snow | 55 | 51 |
| Comfort | 80 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 43 | 79 |
| Handling | 82 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
69
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Premier A/S is generally regarded as a competent tire in dry and mild conditions, offering a comfortable ride and predictable handling. However, it frequently fails to meet user expectations regarding tread longevity and winter weather performance, leading to a mixed reception given its premium price point.
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality with effective bump damping
- Predictable and precise handling in dry conditions
- Good center-line tracking and steering feedback
- Strong performance in warm, dry weather
Cons
- Disappointing tread life and premature wear
- Poor traction and confidence in snow and ice
- Susceptibility to hydroplaning at highway speeds
- High price point relative to overall value and longevity
Observations
- Users reported significant performance degradation in winter conditions on compact vehicles like the Toyota Corolla.
- Premature center-tread wear was noted even with consistent maintenance and proper tire pressure.
The Michelin Primacy MXM4 is generally regarded as a comfort-oriented grand touring tire that excels in ride quality and tread longevity but falls short for performance-minded drivers. While users praise its ability to dampen road vibrations and maintain durability, many report lackluster handling, significant understeer, and underwhelming wet-weather traction when pushed.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
- Strong tread life and durability
- High fuel efficiency
- Effective resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain
Cons
- Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
- Noticeable understeer when cornering
- Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
- Increased road noise on certain surfaces
Observations
- Drivers of high-torque FWD vehicles report significant wheelspin and traction issues in wet conditions.
- Tesla Model 3 owners noted a decline in handling performance compared to dedicated summer tires, suggesting the tire is better suited for comfort than spirited driving.
- The tire's run-flat variants are noted for maintaining a surprisingly soft and compliant ride despite their reinforced construction.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Premier A/S | B · Michelin Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring All Season tire | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Michelin
69
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Premier A/S — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Michelin Primacy MXM4 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 79 vs 43 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Premier A/S scores 82 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Premier A/S scores 86 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Premier A/S scores 80 vs 66 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Premier A/S
Tire B · Michelin Primacy MXM4
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Premier A/S also compared with
Michelin Primacy MXM4 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.