Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Vredestein

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

Summer Max Performance tires

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
237 owner reviews
Dry
91
Wet
88
Comfort
85
Noise
–
Treadwear
79
Handling
85

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ultrac Sessanta leads by 8
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
83
B — Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
91
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Ultrac Sessanta
Tire Rack owners 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 91
SimpleTire owners 99 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ultrac Sessanta leads by 14
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
74
B — Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
88
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Ultrac Sessanta
Tire Rack owners 81 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 88
SimpleTire owners 98 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ultrac Sessanta leads by 11
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
74
B — Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
85
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Ultrac Sessanta
Tire Rack owners 80 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 85
SimpleTire owners 97 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
72
B — Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
–
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Ultrac Sessanta
SimpleTire owners 98 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ultrac Sessanta leads by 34
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
45
B — Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
79
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Ultrac Sessanta
Tire Rack owners 56 –
Tyre Reviews owners – 79
SimpleTire owners 92 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ultrac Sessanta leads by 2
A — Continental ContiSportContact 5
83
B — Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
85
Why this score
SourceContiSportContact 5Ultrac Sessanta
Tyre Reviews owners – 85

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Relative Score 69 85
Dry 83 91
Wet 74 88
Comfort 74 85
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 45 79
Handling 83 85

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiSportContact 5

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

The Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta is widely regarded as a high-performance tire that offers exceptional value, frequently outperforming more expensive premium brands in wet and dry grip. While users consistently praise its handling, steering feedback, and distinctive aesthetic, opinions on tread life and noise levels are polarized, likely due to varying vehicle setups and driving styles.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
  • Distinctive and visually appealing tread design
  • Effective rim protection and stiff sidewall response

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many users reporting rapid wear
  • Increased road noise, often described as a drone or bearing-like sound
  • Poor performance in snow and icy conditions
  • Noticeable 'break-in' period where grip is initially compromised
  • Tendency to tramline on uneven road surfaces

Observations

  • Users transitioning from run-flat tires on BMWs and other performance sedans reported significant improvements in ride comfort and steering feedback.
  • Owners of high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles noted that while grip is excellent, the tires can wear out rapidly under spirited driving conditions.
  • Some users with larger wheel diameters (18-20 inches) reported increased road noise and sensitivity to road grooves compared to smaller sizes.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 B · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta
Category—Summer Max Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available30—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth8 - 10/32″—
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Vredestein

Winner: Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta — better treadwear, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 79 vs 45 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 88 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 85 vs 74 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta scores 91 vs 83 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.