Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental ContiTrac vs Continental CrossContact LX25 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
VerdictOnly Continental CrossContact LX25 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Continental CrossContact LX25
82
Why this score
SourceContiTracCrossContact LX25
Professional tests (TWG score) – 71
Tire Rack owners – 93
Tyre Reviews owners – 93
SimpleTire owners – 99

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Continental CrossContact LX25
92
Why this score
SourceContiTracCrossContact LX25
Tire Rack owners – 92
Tyre Reviews owners – 93
SimpleTire owners – 93

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
Why this score
SourceContiTracCrossContact LX25
Professional tests (TWG score) – 100
Tire Rack owners – 83
Tyre Reviews owners – 90
SimpleTire owners – 86

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
Why this score
SourceContiTracCrossContact LX25
Tire Rack owners – 90
Tyre Reviews owners – 97
SimpleTire owners – 95

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Continental CrossContact LX25
93
Why this score
SourceContiTracCrossContact LX25
SimpleTire owners – 94

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Continental CrossContact LX25
89
Why this score
SourceContiTracCrossContact LX25
Tire Rack owners – 91
Tyre Reviews owners – 93
SimpleTire owners – 89

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ContiTrac
–
B — Continental CrossContact LX25
85
Why this score
SourceContiTracCrossContact LX25
Tyre Reviews owners – 85

Scores at a glance

Continental ContiTrac vs Continental CrossContact LX25: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiTracContinental CrossContact LX25
Relative Score – 90
Dry – 82
Wet – 92
Snow – 94
Comfort – 94
Noise – 93
Treadwear – 89
Handling – 85

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ContiTrac

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Continental CrossContact LX25

The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Significantly improved braking performance
  • Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
  • Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes

Observations

  • Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
  • Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiTrac B · Continental CrossContact LX25
Sizes available—40
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″
Tread depth12 - 14/32″10 - 12/32″
UTQG520 A B740 A A - B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure44 - 80 psi44 - 51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Continental

Only Continental CrossContact LX25 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental ContiTrac
Tire B · Continental CrossContact LX25

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.