78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra vs Continental CrossContact LX Sport — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
62
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
57/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better snow, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 69 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 60 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 51 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 92 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 74 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 93 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 64 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 39 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 81 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Alenza AS Ultra leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Alenza AS Ultra | CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 64 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 62 |
| Dry | 88 | 77 |
| Wet | 83 | 70 |
| Snow | 81 | 52 |
| Comfort | 83 | 74 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 66 | 41 |
| Handling | 74 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
Tire A
62
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra presents a polarized user experience, characterized by a significant divide between those praising its wet and dry handling performance and those disappointed by its longevity and noise levels. While some users report exceptional tread life and reliable all-season traction, others cite premature wear and intrusive road noise, suggesting that performance may vary significantly based on vehicle application and driving conditions.
Pros
- Strong traction on both wet and dry road surfaces
- Improved ride comfort and handling compared to some factory-installed alternatives
- Capable performance in varied weather conditions for some users
- High durability reported by long-term users
Cons
- Reports of premature tread wear and short service life
- Noticeable road noise compared to other premium tires
- Inconsistent performance in severe winter conditions, particularly on ice and deep snow
- Potential for reduced fuel economy
Observations
- Users on heavy SUVs and trucks report mixed results, with some achieving high mileage while others experience rapid tread degradation.
- Drivers transitioning from OEM tires, such as the Bridgestone Ecopia, have noted a distinct increase in cabin noise levels.
- Regular maintenance, specifically rotations every 5,000 miles, is highlighted as critical for maximizing the lifespan of this tire.
The Continental CrossContact LX Sport receives a polarized reception, characterized by high praise for its dry-road handling and off-road capability, contrasted sharply by widespread frustration regarding premature tread wear. While some users appreciate its quiet ride and versatile performance, a significant portion of owners report unacceptable longevity, often requiring replacement well before the 20,000-mile mark.
Pros
- Strong dry-road handling and steering response
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Effective traction in light off-road and muddy conditions
- Reliable performance in varied seasonal weather for some users
Cons
- Extremely rapid and inconsistent tread wear
- Poor wet-weather performance and susceptibility to aquaplaning
- Lack of a mileage warranty leading to high long-term ownership costs
- Reported structural issues including sidewall cracking and premature rubber degradation
Observations
- Owners of heavier SUVs, such as the Volvo XC90 and Land Rover Discovery Sport, report the most severe tread wear issues, suggesting the tire may struggle with the weight of larger vehicles.
- Performance-oriented SUV drivers, such as those with the Alfa Romeo Stelvio, generally appreciate the handling characteristics but note that the tire is not a substitute for dedicated summer or winter rubber.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra | B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 46 | 32 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 800 A A | 480 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
62
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra — better snow, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 81 vs 52 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 66 vs 41 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 83 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra scores 88 vs 77 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra
Tire B · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra also compared with
Continental CrossContact LX Sport also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.