Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX Sport vs Michelin CrossClimate+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

CrossClimate+ is ahead, 78–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 559 reviews

“2024 EXL Tire Review - Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/60/18 Replaced the oem tires with only 10,000 miles with these after reading reviews and the price point. Very happy with them, better handling and feel with less road noise and much better on grooved pavement. The oem Bridgestones wandered badly on grooved pavement. Highly recommended. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 60

    Dry

    CrossClimate+ +25
    85
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–91
    Reviews found online5578
  2. 60

    Wet

    CrossClimate+ +19
    79
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–79
    Reviews found online5778
  3. 61

    Snow

    CrossClimate+ +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–68
    Reviews found online5472
  4. 64

    Comfort

    CrossClimate+ +9
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–71
    Reviews found online5876
  5. 65

    Noise

    CrossClimate+ +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–65
    Reviews found online6173
  6. 43

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate+ +37
    80
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossClimate+
    Professional tests (TWG score)–83
    Reviews found online2775
  7. 48

    Handling

    CrossClimate+ +25
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossClimate+
    Reviews found online4873
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX Sport vs Michelin CrossClimate+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX SportMichelin CrossClimate+
Relative Score 56 78
Dry 60 85
Wet 60 79
Snow 61 70
Comfort 64 73
Noise 65 68
Treadwear 43 80
Handling 48 73

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

CrossContact LX Sport

CrossClimate+

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX Sport

Pros

  • Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
  • Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
  • Confident performance in light snow and winter weather

Cons

  • Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
  • Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
  • Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX Sport review

Tire B CrossClimate+

Pros

  • Excellent traction and confidence in light to moderate snow and ice.
  • Strong wet and dry road handling that rivals dedicated summer tires.
  • Impressive tread longevity and durability over high mileage.

Cons

  • Performance in wet conditions can diminish significantly as the tire wears.
  • Increased road noise reported by some users compared to dedicated summer tires.
  • Occasional reports of a harsh or 'bouncy' ride on certain vehicle suspensions.
All owner themes in the CrossClimate+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact LX Sport

Mixed

Community opinions on the Continental CrossContact LX Sport are mixed, with some owners praising their handling, quiet ride, and role as OEM equipment, while others report disappointment, premature wear, and sidewall durability issues. They are frequently compared to newer alternatives like the Hankook iON evo AS SUV and Michelin CrossClimate2, particularly in EV efficiency discussions.

r/VWatlas ·3 upvotes ·2019-10-07

“Issues with Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires Anybody having premature wear on their tires? In South Texas these tires are notorious for having flaking/peeling/chunking issues on the tread. Had to replace mine after 26k, but noticed the issues much earlier than that. Not a warrantable condition but Continental did give proration based on tread depth. Used the credit towards some new Michelins. Read more”

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2026-07-05

“Yokohama YK-CTX rolling resistance I blew a tire on my fairly new to me Audi Q8 E-tron EV while out of town, and the only reasonable tires in stock were Yokohama YK-CTX. I was previously running Continental CrossContact LX Sport (which are poorly rated on TireRack but seem to be the OE tire), and I'd prefer to not lose any significant range. I'm concerned that Discount Tire's website shows the YK-CTX with even lower EV range than the CrossClimate2 which most say loses 10% range compared to OE EV tires. Does anybody have any experience or knowledge of the YK-CTX compared to an EV specific tire? Discount Tire's website has no information on the CrossContact LX Sport for comparison, and I'm not sure how accurate this EV range data is.”

r/tires ·1 upvote ·2025-10-26

“CrossContact LX Sport Hey folks, I have a 2024 CRV with 4 CrossContact LX Sport tires from the dealership. I have less than 9500 miles om my vehicle/tires but it appears I have a slight hole on the sidewall. If I place my finger on it the air stops coming out. I ordered a set of CrossClimate2s from Costco knowing that AWD vehicles need to match all 4 generally speaking to prevent issues with the drive train, but after my father member looked at it he insisted that I just need to slap a replacement on the single tire given theyre so new. Tldr: is it worth to buy a new set of CrossClimate2s or should I just get a single CrossContact and have tire rack match the tread depth? Kinda don't wanna be out $1400 but also went with my gut on it given i dont wanna f up my drive train on my vehicle and the CrossContacts according to reviews have high failure rates even at low mileage. Please let me know.”

Top themes
#OEM Equipment Quality#EV Efficiency and Range#Wear and Durability Issues#Road Noise and Handling#Tire Comparisons

Based on 15 community posts

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX Sport B · Michelin CrossClimate+
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available32—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth9/32″—
UTQG480 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport

Michelin CrossClimate+

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better treadwear, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 80 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 85 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 73 vs 48 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 79 vs 60 on wet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

78

Leads

CrossClimate+

Amazon