Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken ZIEX ZE329 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | ZIEX ZE329 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 76 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | ZIEX ZE329 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 53 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | ZIEX ZE329 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | ZIEX ZE329 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 49 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | ZIEX ZE329 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | ZIEX ZE329 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 33 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | ZIEX ZE329 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 60 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Falken ZIEX ZE329 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 52 |
| Dry | 82 | 76 |
| Wet | 92 | 53 |
| Snow | 94 | – |
| Comfort | 94 | 49 |
| Noise | 93 | – |
| Treadwear | 89 | 33 |
| Handling | 85 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
- Significantly improved braking performance
- Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
- Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes
Observations
- Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
- Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
The Falken ZIEX ZE329 receives a polarized reception, with users frequently citing significant issues regarding tread longevity and poor wet-weather performance. While a minority of drivers appreciate the dry-road grip and comfort, the consensus points toward a disappointing value proposition due to premature wear and inconsistent reliability.
Pros
- Satisfactory grip on dry pavement
- Acceptable ride comfort for daily commuting
- Includes a protective rim bead for alloy wheels
Cons
- Extremely poor tread life and premature wear
- Unreliable and dangerous performance in wet or snowy conditions
- High levels of road noise
- Concerns regarding structural quality and sidewall durability
Observations
- Performance-oriented vehicles like the Mitsubishi Evolution reported better satisfaction with dry grip, though this may be attributed to specific driving styles.
- Front-wheel-drive vehicles, such as the Acura 3.2 TL-S, experienced notably accelerated front-tire wear, often requiring replacement well before the expected mileage.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Falken ZIEX ZE329 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Falken
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 33 on treadwear.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 49 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 92 vs 53 on wet.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 85 vs 60 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.