Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken ZIEX ZE329 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Falken

Falken ZIEX ZE329

Summer Touring tires

Falken ZIEX ZE329 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
10 owner reviews
Dry
76
Wet
53
Snow
–
Comfort
49
Noise
–
Treadwear
33
Handling
60

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 6
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
82
B — Falken ZIEX ZE329
76
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
Professional tests (TWG score) 71 –
Tire Rack owners 93 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 76
SimpleTire owners 99 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 39
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
92
B — Falken ZIEX ZE329
53
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
Tire Rack owners 92 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 53
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Falken ZIEX ZE329
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tire Rack owners 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –
SimpleTire owners 86 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 45
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Falken ZIEX ZE329
49
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
Tire Rack owners 90 –
Tyre Reviews owners 97 49
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
93
B — Falken ZIEX ZE329
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 56
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
89
B — Falken ZIEX ZE329
33
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 33
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 25
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
85
B — Falken ZIEX ZE329
60
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
Tyre Reviews owners 85 60

Scores at a glance

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken ZIEX ZE329: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Falken ZIEX ZE329
Relative Score 89 52
Dry 82 76
Wet 92 53
Snow 94 –
Comfort 94 49
Noise 93 –
Treadwear 89 33
Handling 85 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental CrossContact LX25

The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Significantly improved braking performance
  • Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
  • Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes

Observations

  • Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
  • Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Tire B Falken ZIEX ZE329

The Falken ZIEX ZE329 receives a polarized reception, with users frequently citing significant issues regarding tread longevity and poor wet-weather performance. While a minority of drivers appreciate the dry-road grip and comfort, the consensus points toward a disappointing value proposition due to premature wear and inconsistent reliability.

Pros

  • Satisfactory grip on dry pavement
  • Acceptable ride comfort for daily commuting
  • Includes a protective rim bead for alloy wheels

Cons

  • Extremely poor tread life and premature wear
  • Unreliable and dangerous performance in wet or snowy conditions
  • High levels of road noise
  • Concerns regarding structural quality and sidewall durability

Observations

  • Performance-oriented vehicles like the Mitsubishi Evolution reported better satisfaction with dry grip, though this may be attributed to specific driving styles.
  • Front-wheel-drive vehicles, such as the Acura 3.2 TL-S, experienced notably accelerated front-tire wear, often requiring replacement well before the expected mileage.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Falken ZIEX ZE329
Category—Summer Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Falken

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 33 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 49 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 92 vs 53 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 85 vs 60 on handling.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE329

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.