Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Firestone Affinity Touring — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
VerdictOnly Continental CrossContact LX25 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
82
B — Firestone Affinity Touring
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Affinity Touring
Professional tests (TWG score) 71 –
Tire Rack owners 93 65
Tyre Reviews owners 93 –
SimpleTire owners 99 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
92
B — Firestone Affinity Touring
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Affinity Touring
Tire Rack owners 92 54
Tyre Reviews owners 93 –
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Firestone Affinity Touring
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Affinity Touring
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tire Rack owners 83 40
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –
SimpleTire owners 86 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Firestone Affinity Touring
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Affinity Touring
Tire Rack owners 90 58
Tyre Reviews owners 97 –
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
93
B — Firestone Affinity Touring
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Affinity Touring
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
89
B — Firestone Affinity Touring
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Affinity Touring
Tire Rack owners 91 55
Tyre Reviews owners 93 –
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
85
B — Firestone Affinity Touring
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Affinity Touring
Tyre Reviews owners 85 –

Scores at a glance

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Firestone Affinity Touring: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Firestone Affinity Touring
Relative Score 90 –
Dry 82 –
Wet 92 –
Snow 94 –
Comfort 94 –
Noise 93 –
Treadwear 89 –
Handling 85 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental CrossContact LX25

The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Significantly improved braking performance
  • Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
  • Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes

Observations

  • Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
  • Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Tire B Firestone Affinity Touring

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Firestone Affinity Touring
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Firestone

Only Continental CrossContact LX25 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Firestone Affinity Touring

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.