Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Firestone Destination LE 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Destination LE 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | 83 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Destination LE 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Destination LE 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Destination LE 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Destination LE 2 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Destination LE 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Destination LE 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Firestone Destination LE 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 91 |
| Dry | 82 | 95 |
| Wet | 92 | 91 |
| Snow | 94 | 86 |
| Comfort | 94 | 92 |
| Noise | 93 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 91 |
| Handling | 85 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
- Significantly improved braking performance
- Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
- Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes
Observations
- Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
- Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
The Firestone Destination LE2 is widely regarded as a high-value, reliable all-season tire that excels in daily driving conditions. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, comfortable ride quality, and competitive pricing, making it a popular choice for repeat buyers across a variety of SUVs and light trucks.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry road traction
- High value-to-price ratio
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
- Strong longevity and tread life performance
- Consistent, predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and retain small gravel in tread grooves
- Occasional reports of balancing difficulties
- Some users noted increased noise levels compared to other brands
- Mixed feedback regarding performance in heavy snow or ice
Observations
- Owners of SUVs and crossovers (e.g., Toyota Highlander, Honda Pilot, Ford Edge) frequently report the LE2 as a superior, more affordable alternative to OEM factory-installed tires.
- Light truck owners (e.g., Ford Ranger) noted significant improvements in ride comfort and handling compared to more aggressive all-terrain or previous tire sets.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Firestone Destination LE 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Firestone
Too close to call: Continental CrossContact LX25 and Firestone Destination LE 2 are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact LX25 is stronger on snow. Firestone Destination LE 2 is stronger on dry and handling.
Firestone Destination LE 2 scores 95 vs 82 on dry.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 86 on snow.
Firestone Destination LE 2 scores 90 vs 85 on handling.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.