Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Firestone Destination LE 2 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Firestone Destination LE 2 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
101 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
91
Snow
86
Comfort
92
Noise
92
Treadwear
91
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Continental CrossContact LX25 and Firestone Destination LE 2 are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact LX25 is stronger on snow. Firestone Destination LE 2 is stronger on dry and handling.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Destination LE 2 leads by 13
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
82
B — Firestone Destination LE 2
95
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Destination LE 2
Professional tests (TWG score) 71 –
Tire Rack owners 93 83
Tyre Reviews owners 93 80
SimpleTire owners 99 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 1
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
92
B — Firestone Destination LE 2
91
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Destination LE 2
Tire Rack owners 92 71
Tyre Reviews owners 93 90
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 8
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Firestone Destination LE 2
86
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Destination LE 2
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tire Rack owners 83 88
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –
SimpleTire owners 86 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 2
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
94
B — Firestone Destination LE 2
92
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Destination LE 2
Tire Rack owners 90 71
Tyre Reviews owners 97 80
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 1
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
93
B — Firestone Destination LE 2
92
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Destination LE 2
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Destination LE 2 leads by 2
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
89
B — Firestone Destination LE 2
91
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Destination LE 2
Tire Rack owners 91 86
Tyre Reviews owners 93 –
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Destination LE 2 leads by 5
A — Continental CrossContact LX25
85
B — Firestone Destination LE 2
90
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Destination LE 2
Tyre Reviews owners 85 90

Scores at a glance

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Firestone Destination LE 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Firestone Destination LE 2
Relative Score 90 91
Dry 82 95
Wet 92 91
Snow 94 86
Comfort 94 92
Noise 93 92
Treadwear 89 91
Handling 85 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental CrossContact LX25

The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Significantly improved braking performance
  • Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
  • Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes

Observations

  • Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
  • Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Tire B Firestone Destination LE 2

The Firestone Destination LE2 is widely regarded as a high-value, reliable all-season tire that excels in daily driving conditions. Users consistently praise its impressive wet and dry traction, comfortable ride quality, and competitive pricing, making it a popular choice for repeat buyers across a variety of SUVs and light trucks.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry road traction
  • High value-to-price ratio
  • Quiet and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong longevity and tread life performance
  • Consistent, predictable handling characteristics

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and retain small gravel in tread grooves
  • Occasional reports of balancing difficulties
  • Some users noted increased noise levels compared to other brands
  • Mixed feedback regarding performance in heavy snow or ice

Observations

  • Owners of SUVs and crossovers (e.g., Toyota Highlander, Honda Pilot, Ford Edge) frequently report the LE2 as a superior, more affordable alternative to OEM factory-installed tires.
  • Light truck owners (e.g., Ford Ranger) noted significant improvements in ride comfort and handling compared to more aggressive all-terrain or previous tire sets.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Firestone Destination LE 2
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Firestone

Too close to call: Continental CrossContact LX25 and Firestone Destination LE 2 are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact LX25 is stronger on snow. Firestone Destination LE 2 is stronger on dry and handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Destination LE 2 scores 95 vs 82 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 86 on snow.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Destination LE 2 scores 90 vs 85 on handling.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Firestone Destination LE 2

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.