90
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
92/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
87/100
6 professional tests
User signal (40%)
74/100
4 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better comfort, treadwear and snow. Pick the Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X if noise and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo 3 X leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | 88 |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 93% | 91% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 87 |
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | 83 |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 100% | 90% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 53 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo 3 X leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 90 | 84 |
| Dry | 82 | 86 |
| Wet | 92 | 86 |
| Snow | 94 | 86 |
| Comfort | 94 | 75 |
| Noise | 93 | 100 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 80 |
| Handling | 85 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
90
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 91% #7/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +2 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 17% #6/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +33.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 100% #3/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 90% #7/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +10 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
- Significantly improved braking performance
- Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
- Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes
Observations
- Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
- Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
The Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X is widely regarded as a highly capable winter performer, particularly in deep and heavy snow conditions where it offers excellent traction and braking. While it provides strong value compared to premium competitors, user experiences are polarized regarding its comfort levels and noise output, with some drivers finding the ride quality significantly lacking.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and control in deep, fresh, and heavy wet snow
- Strong braking performance in cold, winter conditions
- Competitive pricing compared to other premium winter tire brands
- Effective performance in low-temperature wet conditions
Cons
- High levels of road noise reported by some users
- Noticeable lack of ride comfort and perceived stiffness
- Soft handling characteristics when temperatures rise above 13°C
- Inconsistent user satisfaction regarding long-term comfort
Observations
- Owners of SUVs, such as the Volvo XC60, have reported that the tire's stiff construction can lead to an uncomfortable ride experience.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Ultra High Performance Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
90
/ 100
Continental
84
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better comfort, treadwear and snow. Pick the Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X if noise and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 75 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 80 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 86 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X scores 100 vs 93 on noise.
Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental CrossContact LX25 also compared with
Hankook Winter i*cept evo 3 X also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.