Skip to content
tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

VS
Tire B Kumho

Kumho Ecsta HP4 716

All Season Touring tires

Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
1 owner review
Dry
80
Wet
60
Snow
–
Comfort
60
Noise
–
Treadwear
70
Handling
70
Check price on Amazon

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 2
A
82
B
80
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Ecsta HP4 716
Professional tests (TWG score) 71 –
Tire Rack owners 93 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 80
SimpleTire owners 99 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 32
A
92
B
60
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Ecsta HP4 716
Tire Rack owners 92 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 60
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
94
B
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Ecsta HP4 716
Professional tests (TWG score) 100 –
Tire Rack owners 83 –
Tyre Reviews owners 90 –
SimpleTire owners 86 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 34
A
94
B
60
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Ecsta HP4 716
Tire Rack owners 90 –
Tyre Reviews owners 97 60
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A
93
B
–
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Ecsta HP4 716
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 19
A
89
B
70
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Ecsta HP4 716
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 93 70
SimpleTire owners 89 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CrossContact LX25 leads by 15
A
85
B
70
Why this score
SourceCrossContact LX25Ecsta HP4 716
Tyre Reviews owners 85 70

Scores at a glance

CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
Relative Score 89 67
Dry 82 80
Wet 92 60
Snow 94 –
Comfort 94 60
Noise 93 –
Treadwear 89 70
Handling 85 70

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental CrossContact LX25

The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
  • Significantly improved braking performance
  • Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives

Cons

  • Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
  • Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes

Observations

  • Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
  • Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
Tire B Kumho Ecsta HP4 716

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
Category—All Season Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Kumho

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 92 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 70 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 85 vs 70 on handling.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
Check price on Amazon

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.