89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
74/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
92/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Vredestein Ultrac Cento — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
80/100
22 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ultrac Cento leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 71 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 97 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | 95 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 93 | 86 |
| SimpleTire owners | 89 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CrossContact LX25 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | CrossContact LX25 | Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 73 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 100 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Vredestein Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 81 |
| Dry | 82 | 83 |
| Wet | 92 | 78 |
| Snow | 94 | – |
| Comfort | 94 | 82 |
| Noise | 93 | – |
| Treadwear | 89 | 86 |
| Handling | 85 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental CrossContact LX25 is highly regarded by users for its exceptional ride comfort, low noise levels, and reliable all-season traction. It is frequently cited as a superior replacement for factory-installed tires, offering a balanced performance profile that excels in daily driving conditions across various climates.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and quiet operation
- Significantly improved braking performance
- Predictable and confident handling in light snow and wet conditions
- Strong value proposition compared to premium factory-installed alternatives
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and eject road gravel
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear in specific use cases
- Stiffer sidewall response when encountering sharp road imperfections or deep potholes
Observations
- Luxury SUV owners (Mercedes ML/GLE) report a significant improvement in ride quality and cabin noise when replacing factory run-flat tires with the LX25.
- Users with 19-inch wheel configurations on compact crossovers like the Mazda CX-5 find the tire to be a reliable solution for challenging New England weather conditions.
The Vredestein Ultrac Cento is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented summer tire that excels in longevity and noise suppression. While it is highly praised for its durability and smooth ride during long-distance cruising, it generally lacks the sharp steering feedback and ultimate wet-weather grip required for aggressive or sporty driving.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong value proposition compared to premium competitors
- Stable and predictable performance for highway cruising
Cons
- Lack of steering feedback and sporty handling characteristics
- Inconsistent reports regarding fuel economy improvements
- Mediocre performance in extreme winter conditions (snow/ice)
- Wet-weather grip is considered adequate but not class-leading
Observations
- Users driving high-mileage sedans (Volvo, Passat) report excellent longevity, often outlasting more expensive performance-oriented tires.
- Drivers of smaller, sportier vehicles (MG ZR, BMW 3 Series) noted a significant improvement in ride comfort but expressed disappointment in the lack of dynamic handling feedback.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Vredestein Ultrac Cento |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Continental
81
/ 100
Vredestein
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better wet, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 92 vs 78 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 94 vs 82 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 85 vs 73 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 89 vs 86 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Cento
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental CrossContact LX25 also compared with
Vredestein Ultrac Cento also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.