tirewheelguide.com
Head-to-head Updated

Continental EcoContact 6 vs Michelin Energy Saver+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Energy Saver+ is ahead, 71–60

Check price on Amazon · Energy Saver+ or EcoContact 6 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire AContinental

EcoContact 6

Summer

Tests 73 · 6 tests Owners 49 · 3,203 reviews

Best test result: #8 of 10 in 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test (overall ranking)

“What’s your opinion about eco tires like the continental eco contact 6, Michelin energy saver, etc. My car came with the continental eco contact 6 and i found them average on the dry. But, in the wet they felt bad, and in the rain especially around here in mountainous roads, they felt bad while turning and slowing down for a corner soon after i replaced them with the crossclimate 2 and still thinking about what I’m going to do with them if i put them on again on summer or sell them and keep the cross climate on. Read more”

Tire BMichelin

Energy Saver+

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 65 reviews

Best test result: #15 of 47 in 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview (overall ranking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Energy Saver+ +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6Energy Saver+
    Professional tests (TWG score)77–
    Reviews found online5071
  2. 55

    Wet

    Energy Saver+ +15
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6Energy Saver+
    Professional tests (TWG score)56–
    Reviews found online5469
  3. 63

    Comfort

    Energy Saver+ +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6Energy Saver+
    Reviews found online5772
  4. 82

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6Energy Saver+
    Professional tests (TWG score)92–
  5. 64

    Treadwear

    Energy Saver+ +9
    73
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6Energy Saver+
    Professional tests (TWG score)79–
    Reviews found online4077
  6. 51

    Handling

    Energy Saver+ +21
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEcoContact 6Energy Saver+
    Reviews found online5172
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental EcoContact 6Michelin Energy Saver+
Relative Score 60 71
Dry 66 70
Wet 55 70
Comfort 63 71
Noise 82 –
Treadwear 64 73
Handling 51 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

EcoContact 6

Energy Saver+

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryEcoContact 6Energy Saver+ΔBoth?
Overall Ranking Overall 13% #8/10 · 2022 ViBilagare Eco vs Normal Tyre Test 7% #15/47 · 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview +5.8 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EcoContact 6

Pros

  • Excellent fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • Low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Good dry grip and stable handling under normal driving conditions

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, especially on drive wheels
  • Subpar wet-weather grip and high susceptibility to aquaplaning
  • Shallow initial tread depth out of the box (approx. 6.0-6.5mm)
All owner themes in the EcoContact 6 review

Tire B Energy Saver+

Pros

  • Exceptional treadwear and longevity with many users reporting high mileage (30,000 to 60,000+ miles)
  • Impressive fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • High level of ride comfort and low road noise

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather traction and slippery behavior during cornering or braking in the rain
  • Prone to aquaplaning at higher speeds on wet roads
  • Tendency to develop sidewall cracking or dry rot as the tires age
All owner themes in the Energy Saver+ review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental EcoContact 6

Mixed

Community opinion on the Continental Eco Contact 6 heavily leans toward criticism, primarily due to compromised wet-weather grip and durability issues such as premature wear or cracking/chunking. While users acknowledge their strengths in maximizing fuel efficiency and EV range, many consider the safety trade-offs in the rain unacceptable and prefer switching to alternatives like all-seasons or dedicated EV tires.

r/TyreReviews ·6 upvotes ·2026-03-20

“use up factory tires or replace them? asking for come clarity of mind. my (electric) car's factory tires are "not great", just ecocontact 6's that put efficiency over everything else basically, they are not directional and will probably last a long while because they are so hard. this winter i bought a set of pirelli winter 3's for my trip to norway but also for winter in general. those tires preform better on litteral ice than the ecocontact's do in the rain. its a striking difference. the pirellis handled a 13% incline of ice brilliantly and even actual blizzard conditions. (both i got on video as people didnt believe me) i am genuinely amazed what modern winter tires can do. but i am a bit torn on the choice between getting rid of basically brand new tires (they only did about 5k) and replacing them with something decent for the summer and having tires that actually work when its wet or stop when i need them to or keep driving them until the ones i got are worn out. to be clear, i dont give a crap about the effiicency or really the lifespan of tires. braking and wet performance is vastly more important to me than saving a Watt. saving energy nor lifespan isnt a great comfort when i'm sliding into another car or tree. would getting something decent make such a big difference to warrant the cost and waste or am i better off to just run these down first? edit: sidenote, the car in question is a Renault 5. its got a pretty weird tire size (195/55R18) that limits options a bit”
r/AutoTuga ·3 upvotes ·2026-08-20

“Desgaste anormal Continental EcoContact 6 Q — BMW X3 BMW X3 (~72.000 km, cerca de 1 ano e pouco). Já trocou os 4 pneus uma vez e vai agora para o segundo jogo. O primeiro conjunto começou a escamar / sair aos bocados (principalmente à frente). A marca assumiu e colocou pneus iguais (Continental EcoContact 6 Q). Agora, ao fim de cerca de 20.000 km, está a acontecer exatamente o mesmo à frente. Para piorar, após notar perda de pressão lenta atrás, fomos verificar e os dois pneus traseiros estão completamente comidos por dentro. Mais alguém com problemas crónicos de desgaste prematuro com este modelo de pneu ou comportamento semelhante no X3? Read more”
r/tires ·1 upvote ·2025-04-09

“Possessore di Continental eco contact 6 2021, si crepano dopo i primi 3 Mila km, sostituite la 1 volta da Continental (solo le due davanti....) in garanzia con la versione 2022, ridato problema poco dopo. Non comprerò più Continental, cerca online è pieno di gente con questo problema”
Top themes
#Poor Wet Weather Performance#High Fuel and Energy Efficiency#Durability and Premature Wear#OEM Factory Fit Tires#Tire Cracking and Chunking Issues#Comparison with Competitor Tires

Based on 24 community posts

Tire B

Michelin Energy Saver+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental EcoContact 6 B · Michelin Energy Saver+
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth7/32″—
UTQG320 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental EcoContact 6

Michelin Energy Saver+

Winner: Michelin Energy Saver+ — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 72 vs 51 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 70 vs 55 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 73 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 71 vs 63 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental EcoContact 6
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver+
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Leads

Energy Saver+

Amazon