70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
17 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Potenza S007 vs Continental ExtremeContact Sport — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
43 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007 | ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 92 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 92 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007 | ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 75 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 85 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007 | ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 86 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 30
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007 | ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 57 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Potenza S007 | ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza S007 | Continental ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 89 |
| Dry | 85 | 95 |
| Wet | 74 | 90 |
| Snow | – | 87 |
| Comfort | 67 | 91 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 87 |
| Handling | 72 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Tire A
89
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Potenza S007 is a polarizing ultra-high-performance tire that excels in aggressive, dry-weather driving but receives inconsistent feedback regarding wet-weather safety and longevity. While owners of high-performance vehicles often praise its grip and track-day capabilities, others report significant issues with rapid tread wear and poor performance in standing water.
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and traction for high-horsepower vehicles
- Strong performance during spirited driving and track-day use
- Aesthetically pleasing design with a comfortable ride for a low-profile tire
- Effective as original equipment (OE) on specific performance models
Cons
- Significant concerns regarding hydroplaning and safety in wet or damp conditions
- Rapid and premature tread wear reported by many users
- Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them louder than expected
- Stiff sidewall construction can lead to a harsh ride on uneven surfaces
Observations
- Users with high-horsepower rear-wheel-drive vehicles report excellent traction when tires are properly warmed in dry conditions.
- Owners of heavier sedans or non-dedicated sports cars have reported premature wear, with some noting the tire is specifically engineered for specialized performance chassis rather than general luxury use.
- The tire is frequently noted as a stiff-riding option, which can exacerbate the ride quality of vehicles already equipped with firm factory suspensions.
The Continental ExtremeContact Sport is widely regarded as a premier ultra-high-performance summer tire that excels in balancing daily driving comfort with aggressive handling capabilities. Users consistently praise its superior wet and dry grip, low noise levels, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors, though some enthusiasts note a softer sidewall that can slightly compromise steering precision.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Excellent value-to-performance ratio
- Strong performance even as tread wears down
Cons
- Softer sidewall can lead to a slight delay in steering response
- Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose performance during sustained high-heat track sessions
- Poor performance in cold temperatures (below 50°F)
- Potential for flat-spotting if left stationary in cold weather
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent synergy with the tire's handling characteristics, though some BRZ owners found the sidewall too soft for their specific suspension geometry.
- Drivers transitioning from factory run-flat tires on vehicles like the BMW Z4 noted a transformative improvement in ride quality and stability.
- EV owners noted that the tire handles the high torque and weight of electric vehicles well, though they remain mindful of accelerated tread wear under enthusiastic driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza S007 | B · Continental ExtremeContact Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 340 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 30,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Bridgestone
89
/ 100
Continental
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better treadwear, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 87 vs 57 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 91 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 90 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 95 vs 85 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza S007
Tire B · Continental ExtremeContact Sport
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Potenza S007 also compared with
Continental ExtremeContact Sport also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.