Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Continental ExtremeContact Sport vs Nexen CP661 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Continental

Continental ExtremeContact Sport

Summer Max Performance tires

Continental ExtremeContact Sport tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
43 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
90
Snow
87
Comfort
91
Noise
91
Treadwear
87
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen CP661

Summer Touring tires

Nexen CP661 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
10 owner reviews
Dry
77
Wet
71
Snow
–
Comfort
76
Noise
–
Treadwear
80
Handling
72

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact Sport leads by 18
A — Continental ExtremeContact Sport
95
B — Nexen CP661
77
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact SportCP661
Tire Rack owners 92 –
Tyre Reviews owners 92 77

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact Sport leads by 19
A — Continental ExtremeContact Sport
90
B — Nexen CP661
71
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact SportCP661
Tire Rack owners 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners 85 71

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ExtremeContact Sport
87
B — Nexen CP661
–

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact Sport leads by 15
A — Continental ExtremeContact Sport
91
B — Nexen CP661
76
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact SportCP661
Tire Rack owners 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 76

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Continental ExtremeContact Sport
91
B — Nexen CP661
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact Sport leads by 7
A — Continental ExtremeContact Sport
87
B — Nexen CP661
80
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact SportCP661
Tire Rack owners 80 –
Tyre Reviews owners 83 80

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) ExtremeContact Sport leads by 8
A — Continental ExtremeContact Sport
80
B — Nexen CP661
72
Why this score
SourceExtremeContact SportCP661
Tyre Reviews owners 80 72

Scores at a glance

Continental ExtremeContact Sport vs Nexen CP661: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ExtremeContact SportNexen CP661
Relative Score 89 75
Dry 95 77
Wet 90 71
Snow 87 –
Comfort 91 76
Noise 91 –
Treadwear 87 80
Handling 80 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Continental ExtremeContact Sport

The Continental ExtremeContact Sport is widely regarded as a premier ultra-high-performance summer tire that excels in balancing daily driving comfort with aggressive handling capabilities. Users consistently praise its superior wet and dry grip, low noise levels, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors, though some enthusiasts note a softer sidewall that can slightly compromise steering precision.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • High level of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Excellent value-to-performance ratio
  • Strong performance even as tread wears down

Cons

  • Softer sidewall can lead to a slight delay in steering response
  • Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose performance during sustained high-heat track sessions
  • Poor performance in cold temperatures (below 50°F)
  • Potential for flat-spotting if left stationary in cold weather

Observations

  • Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent synergy with the tire's handling characteristics, though some BRZ owners found the sidewall too soft for their specific suspension geometry.
  • Drivers transitioning from factory run-flat tires on vehicles like the BMW Z4 noted a transformative improvement in ride quality and stability.
  • EV owners noted that the tire handles the high torque and weight of electric vehicles well, though they remain mindful of accelerated tread wear under enthusiastic driving.
Tire B Nexen CP661

The Nexen CP661 is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that consistently exceeds expectations for daily driving and family-oriented vehicles. Users report reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions, alongside commendable tread longevity and low noise levels, making it a strong competitor against more expensive premium brands.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium alternatives.
  • Reliable and consistent grip in both wet and dry weather conditions.
  • Impressive tread life, with some users reporting significantly higher mileage than premium tires.
  • Low road noise levels contributing to a comfortable ride quality.

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread wear reports, with some users experiencing premature replacement intervals.
  • Performance is optimized for standard commuting rather than high-performance driving.
  • Limited availability of specific speed ratings or sizes for specialized vehicles.

Observations

  • Users driving front-wheel-drive hatchbacks noted excellent straight-line tracking and stability on motorway surfaces.
  • Owners of family-oriented vehicles ('mum buses') frequently praised the tire for providing a safe and confident driving experience in varied road conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport B · Nexen CP661
CategorySummer Max Performance tiresSummer Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG340 AA A—
Treadwear warranty30,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental

Nexen

Winner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better wet, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 90 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 95 vs 77 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 91 vs 76 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 80 vs 72 on handling.

Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport
Tire B · Nexen CP661

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.