89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
43 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ExtremeContact Sport vs Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
68
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
72/100
16 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better snow, noise and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 73 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 47
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 57 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 38
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 70 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ExtremeContact Sport leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeContact Sport | Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact Sport | Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 89 | 68 |
| Dry | 95 | 86 |
| Wet | 90 | 76 |
| Snow | 87 | 40 |
| Comfort | 91 | 76 |
| Noise | 91 | 53 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 68 |
| Handling | 80 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
89
/ 100
Tire A
68
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ExtremeContact Sport is widely regarded as a premier ultra-high-performance summer tire that excels in balancing daily driving comfort with aggressive handling capabilities. Users consistently praise its superior wet and dry grip, low noise levels, and excellent value compared to more expensive competitors, though some enthusiasts note a softer sidewall that can slightly compromise steering precision.
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Excellent value-to-performance ratio
- Strong performance even as tread wears down
Cons
- Softer sidewall can lead to a slight delay in steering response
- Tendency to become 'greasy' or lose performance during sustained high-heat track sessions
- Poor performance in cold temperatures (below 50°F)
- Potential for flat-spotting if left stationary in cold weather
Observations
- Owners of lightweight sports cars like the Mazda MX-5 report excellent synergy with the tire's handling characteristics, though some BRZ owners found the sidewall too soft for their specific suspension geometry.
- Drivers transitioning from factory run-flat tires on vehicles like the BMW Z4 noted a transformative improvement in ride quality and stability.
- EV owners noted that the tire handles the high torque and weight of electric vehicles well, though they remain mindful of accelerated tread wear under enthusiastic driving.
The Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS is a performance-oriented run-flat tire that earns praise for its dry-weather grip, cornering stability, and value when purchased as discounted 'new old stock.' However, the consensus is heavily polarized by significant concerns regarding rapid tread wear, harsh ride quality, and inconsistent performance in cold or wet conditions.
Pros
- Strong dry-weather traction and cornering stability
- High value proposition when purchased at clearance or discounted pricing
- Effective run-flat capability for daily drivers
- Improved acceleration and handling compared to some OEM alternatives
Cons
- Extremely short tread life and premature wear
- Harsh and noisy ride quality
- Poor performance and lack of grip in cold or wet conditions
- Stiff sidewalls can lead to a numb steering feel
Observations
- Users with high-torque electric vehicles noted better rear-tire longevity compared to previous Pirelli sets.
- Drivers of performance coupes and MINIs appreciate the ZPS run-flat technology for daily commuting, despite the inherent trade-off in ride comfort.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport | B · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Max Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 340 AA A | 180 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 30,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
89
/ 100
Continental
68
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better snow, noise and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 87 vs 40 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 91 vs 53 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 87 vs 68 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 91 vs 76 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ExtremeContact Sport also compared with
Yokohama Advan Sport ZPS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.