91
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
92/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental ExtremeWinterContact vs Yokohama W.Drive — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
71/100
14 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ExtremeWinterContact — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ExtremeWinterContact leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeWinterContact | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 98 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 77 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
ExtremeWinterContact leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeWinterContact | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 71 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeWinterContact | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 55 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ExtremeWinterContact leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeWinterContact | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 77 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeWinterContact | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 81 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ExtremeWinterContact leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeWinterContact | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 78 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ExtremeWinterContact leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | ExtremeWinterContact | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeWinterContact | Yokohama W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 91 | 78 |
| Dry | 90 | 89 |
| Wet | 90 | 75 |
| Snow | – | 62 |
| Comfort | 95 | 77 |
| Noise | – | 81 |
| Treadwear | 95 | 78 |
| Handling | 85 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
91
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ExtremeWinterContact is highly regarded for its exceptional performance in severe winter conditions, including deep snow and extreme sub-zero temperatures. Users consistently report high levels of confidence and safety, noting that the tire eliminates the need for auxiliary traction aids like snow chains even in mountainous terrain.
Pros
- Outstanding traction on packed snow and ice
- Reliable performance in extreme sub-zero temperatures
- High level of driver confidence in challenging winter conditions
- Proven capability in mountainous terrain
Cons
- Increased road noise associated with XL (extra load) variants
- Potential for reduced cornering and braking precision in XL versions
- Requires seasonal wheel changeover for optimal performance
Observations
- Users opting for smaller rim diameters (e.g., 15-inch) to maintain rolling circumference report excellent comfort and safety.
- The XL (Extra Load) version is noted to have a distinct impact on handling characteristics and noise levels compared to standard load variants.
The Yokohama W Drive presents a polarizing user experience, with performance heavily dependent on vehicle drivetrain and driving style. While many owners report excellent traction in snow and ice, providing a transformative winter driving experience, a significant subset of users—particularly those with high-torque rear-wheel-drive vehicles—report severe handling instability and safety concerns.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and mobility in snow and ice conditions.
- Strong dry-road handling performance, often described as comparable to summer tires.
- Impressive tread longevity when maintained at proper inflation pressures.
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for most users.
Cons
- Significant instability and lack of rear-end grip reported on high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles.
- Inconsistent performance on greasy or wet road surfaces.
- Reports of excessive road noise and harsh ride quality from some users.
- High sensitivity to tire pressure, leading to rapid wear if not monitored.
Observations
- Users of high-torque BMW models (535d, 335d) reported severe traction issues and fishtailing, suggesting a potential mismatch between the tire's compound and high-torque RWD platforms.
- Quattro (AWD) users reported high satisfaction, noting the tires provided reliable grip and durability across varied conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeWinterContact | B · Yokohama W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter High Performance tires | High Performance Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
91
/ 100
Continental
78
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Continental ExtremeWinterContact — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ExtremeWinterContact scores 95 vs 77 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ExtremeWinterContact scores 95 vs 78 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ExtremeWinterContact scores 90 vs 75 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ExtremeWinterContact scores 85 vs 71 on handling.
Tire A · Continental ExtremeWinterContact
Tire B · Yokohama W.Drive
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ExtremeWinterContact also compared with
Yokohama W.Drive also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.