Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 vs Yokohama W.Drive — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth 4S AW21 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 66 | 98 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 77 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 88% | 100% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 97% | 99% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth 4S AW21 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 69 | 77 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 71 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 92% | 90% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 89% | 94% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth 4S AW21 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 55 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 95% | 86% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 100% | 100% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth 4S AW21 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 77 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth 4S AW21 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 99 | 81 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth 4S AW21 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 55 | 78 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | BluEarth 4S AW21 | W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 | Yokohama W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 76 |
| Dry | 75 | 89 |
| Wet | 76 | 75 |
| Snow | 82 | 62 |
| Comfort | 73 | 77 |
| Noise | 99 | 81 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 78 |
| Handling | 70 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 88% #28/35 · 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout | 100% #1/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | -12.1 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #6/7 · The Best All Season Tyres for 2024 | 99% #3/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | -1.5 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 76% #7/7 · The Best All Season Tyres for 2024 | 84% #8/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | -7.9 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #7/7 · 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test | 99% #2/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | +1.4 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 76% #2/7 · The Best All Season Tyres for 2024 | 63% #2/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | +12.5 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/7 · 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test | 13% #8/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | +4.2 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 95% #3/16 · 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | 86% #9/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | +9 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 100% #7/7 · 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test | 100% #9/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 87% #5/7 · 2025 Motor All Season Tyre Test | 92% #8/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | -5.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 92% #11/16 · 2024 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | 90% #7/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | +2.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 89% #6/7 · The Best All Season Tyres for 2024 | 94% #7/9 · 2018 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | -5.1 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 is generally regarded as a competent all-weather tire that excels in wet and winter conditions, providing reliable traction in cold temperatures. While users appreciate its performance in adverse weather, the tire receives mixed feedback regarding its longevity, road noise, and handling characteristics during warmer months.
Pros
- Excellent wet weather grip and stability on motorways
- Strong performance in snow and icy conditions
- Quiet and smooth ride quality during the first two years of ownership
- Aesthetically pleasing tread design
Cons
- Noticeable increase in road noise, described by some as excessive
- Soft compound feel during high-temperature summer driving
- Concerns regarding long-term durability and premature tread cracking
- Unusual steering feedback during low-speed maneuvering
Observations
- Drivers of compact hatchbacks, such as the VW Golf, report acceptable dry and wet grip but note a peculiar sensation in steering feel.
- Performance in warmer climates (30°C+) results in a 'soft' feeling during cornering, suggesting the compound is better suited for temperate or cold environments.
The Yokohama W Drive presents a polarizing user experience, with performance heavily dependent on vehicle drivetrain and driving style. While many owners report excellent traction in snow and ice, providing a transformative winter driving experience, a significant subset of users—particularly those with high-torque rear-wheel-drive vehicles—report severe handling instability and safety concerns.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and mobility in snow and ice conditions.
- Strong dry-road handling performance, often described as comparable to summer tires.
- Impressive tread longevity when maintained at proper inflation pressures.
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for most users.
Cons
- Significant instability and lack of rear-end grip reported on high-torque, rear-wheel-drive vehicles.
- Inconsistent performance on greasy or wet road surfaces.
- Reports of excessive road noise and harsh ride quality from some users.
- High sensitivity to tire pressure, leading to rapid wear if not monitored.
Observations
- Users of high-torque BMW models (535d, 335d) reported severe traction issues and fishtailing, suggesting a potential mismatch between the tire's compound and high-torque RWD platforms.
- Quattro (AWD) users reported high satisfaction, noting the tires provided reliable grip and durability across varied conditions.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 | B · Yokohama W.Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | High Performance Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama W.Drive — better treadwear, dry and comfort. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 if snow and noise matter most to you.
Yokohama W.Drive scores 78 vs 55 on treadwear.
Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 scores 82 vs 62 on snow.
Yokohama BluEarth 4S AW21 scores 99 vs 81 on noise.
Yokohama W.Drive scores 89 vs 75 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.