74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
62/100
5 professional tests
User signal (40%)
75/100
119 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental Premium Contact 5 vs Michelin Energy — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
68/100
42 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental Premium Contact 5 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Michelin Energy if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Premium Contact 5 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 75 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 71 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Premium Contact 5 leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 65 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 1 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Premium Contact 5 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 76 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 54 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 84 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Premium Contact 5 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Premium Contact 5 | Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 61 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Premium Contact 5 | Michelin Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 72 |
| Dry | 80 | 71 |
| Wet | 84 | 65 |
| Snow | 1 | – |
| Comfort | 78 | 76 |
| Noise | 54 | – |
| Treadwear | 58 | 84 |
| Handling | 77 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
72
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental PremiumContact 5 is widely regarded as a high-performance touring tire that excels in wet and dry grip, offering a comfortable and quiet ride. While users frequently praise its safety and handling capabilities, the consensus is heavily polarized by its rapid tread wear and soft sidewall construction, which some drivers find detrimental to steering feedback and longevity.
Pros
- Exceptional grip in both wet and dry road conditions
- High levels of ride comfort and low cabin noise
- Predictable and safe handling characteristics
- Strong braking performance
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering feedback and body roll
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Susceptibility to sidewall damage
Observations
- Drivers of heavier vehicles and SUVs frequently report faster-than-expected tread wear and a lack of sidewall stiffness during cornering.
- Users of smaller, lighter vehicles often praise the tire's comfort and noise reduction, though some note it feels less 'sporty' than previous tires like the Bridgestone Turanza.
- Several owners of high-torque diesel engines reported issues with wheelspin, suggesting the tire may struggle with immediate torque delivery on certain platforms.
The Michelin Energy is widely regarded as a high-longevity, fuel-efficient tire designed primarily for conservative, daily commuters. While many users praise its exceptional tread life and contribution to fuel economy, a significant portion of the user base reports dissatisfaction with its wet-weather grip, lack of steering feedback, and performance during spirited driving.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and comfortable ride quality
- Predictable handling for standard, non-aggressive driving
Cons
- Lack of steering feedback and road feel
- Inconsistent or poor grip in wet conditions
- High price point relative to competitors
- Hard rubber compound can lead to premature cracking
Observations
- Users driving family sedans and hatchbacks (e.g., VW Golf, Toyota Corolla) report the highest satisfaction regarding longevity and economy.
- Drivers of higher-performance vehicles or those with more powerful engines (e.g., Audi A4, Renault Megane 2.0) frequently report issues with wheel spin and lack of traction.
- The tire is frequently noted as a reliable, long-lasting choice for high-mileage commuters and fleet-style usage.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Premium Contact 5 | B · Michelin Energy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Continental
72
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Continental Premium Contact 5 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Michelin Energy if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy scores 84 vs 58 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental Premium Contact 5 scores 84 vs 65 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental Premium Contact 5 scores 77 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental Premium Contact 5 scores 80 vs 71 on dry.
Tire A · Continental Premium Contact 5
Tire B · Michelin Energy
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental Premium Contact 5 also compared with
Michelin Energy also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.