72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
68/100
42 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Energy vs Yokohama Advan dB V552 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Energy — better treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Advan dB V552 if comfort and handling matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Advan dB V552 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Energy | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 72 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Advan dB V552 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Energy | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 66 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Advan dB V552 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Energy | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 84 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Energy | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 65 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Advan dB V552 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Energy | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | 68 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy | Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 70 |
| Dry | 71 | 72 |
| Wet | 65 | 66 |
| Comfort | 76 | 84 |
| Treadwear | 84 | 65 |
| Handling | 61 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy is widely regarded as a high-longevity, fuel-efficient tire designed primarily for conservative, daily commuters. While many users praise its exceptional tread life and contribution to fuel economy, a significant portion of the user base reports dissatisfaction with its wet-weather grip, lack of steering feedback, and performance during spirited driving.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and comfortable ride quality
- Predictable handling for standard, non-aggressive driving
Cons
- Lack of steering feedback and road feel
- Inconsistent or poor grip in wet conditions
- High price point relative to competitors
- Hard rubber compound can lead to premature cracking
Observations
- Users driving family sedans and hatchbacks (e.g., VW Golf, Toyota Corolla) report the highest satisfaction regarding longevity and economy.
- Drivers of higher-performance vehicles or those with more powerful engines (e.g., Audi A4, Renault Megane 2.0) frequently report issues with wheel spin and lack of traction.
- The tire is frequently noted as a reliable, long-lasting choice for high-mileage commuters and fleet-style usage.
The Yokohama Advan dB V552 is widely regarded as a specialized touring tire that prioritizes cabin quietness and ride comfort above all else. While it excels at absorbing road imperfections and reducing noise for daily commuting, users note that its soft sidewall construction results in a lack of steering precision and reduced grip during high-speed maneuvers.
Pros
- Exceptional noise reduction and quiet operation
- Superior ride comfort and vibration absorption
- Effective at smoothing out potholes and road irregularities
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation at highway speeds
- Lack of steering sharpness and cornering confidence
- Mediocre grip levels in both wet and dry conditions compared to performance-oriented tires
Observations
- The tire is specifically engineered as an OE fitment for vehicles like the Mazda3 BP, where its soft sidewall is intended to complement stiffer suspension bushings.
- Users report that increasing tire pressure by 3-4 PSI can mitigate the 'floating' sensation experienced at higher speeds.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy | B · Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Michelin
70
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Energy — better treadwear. Pick the Yokohama Advan dB V552 if comfort and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy scores 84 vs 65 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 84 vs 76 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 68 vs 61 on handling.
Tire A · Michelin Energy
Tire B · Yokohama Advan dB V552
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy also compared with
Yokohama Advan dB V552 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.