75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
54 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama Advan dB V552 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Continental ComfortContact CC6 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 72 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 66 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 84 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 65 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 68 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 70 |
| Dry | 79 | 72 |
| Wet | 66 | 66 |
| Comfort | 89 | 84 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 65 |
| Handling | 71 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
70
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ComfortContact CC6 is widely regarded as a class-leading tire for noise reduction and ride comfort, effectively absorbing road imperfections and providing a serene cabin experience. While it excels in daily commuting and long-distance cruising, it is frequently criticized for its soft sidewalls and lackluster wet-weather performance, making it unsuitable for aggressive driving styles.
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
- Reliable dry-road handling for standard commuting
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
- Lack of steering feedback and stability at higher speeds
Observations
- Users with vehicles lacking factory soundproofing, such as older compact cars, report the most significant improvements in cabin quietness.
- Drivers of taller vehicles or MPVs note that the soft sidewall leads to a lack of confidence during cornering due to increased body roll.
- Performance is highly dependent on driving style; those transitioning from performance-oriented tires often find the CC6's handling characteristics too 'mushy' or unresponsive.
The Yokohama Advan dB V552 is widely regarded as a specialized touring tire that prioritizes cabin quietness and ride comfort above all else. While it excels at absorbing road imperfections and reducing noise for daily commuting, users note that its soft sidewall construction results in a lack of steering precision and reduced grip during high-speed maneuvers.
Pros
- Exceptional noise reduction and quiet operation
- Superior ride comfort and vibration absorption
- Effective at smoothing out potholes and road irregularities
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation at highway speeds
- Lack of steering sharpness and cornering confidence
- Mediocre grip levels in both wet and dry conditions compared to performance-oriented tires
Observations
- The tire is specifically engineered as an OE fitment for vehicles like the Mazda3 BP, where its soft sidewall is intended to complement stiffer suspension bushings.
- Users report that increasing tire pressure by 3-4 PSI can mitigate the 'floating' sensation experienced at higher speeds.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Yokohama Advan dB V552 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Continental
70
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Continental ComfortContact CC6 — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 77 vs 65 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 79 vs 72 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 89 vs 84 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 71 vs 68 on handling.
Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Yokohama Advan dB V552
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ComfortContact CC6 also compared with
Yokohama Advan dB V552 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.