70
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama BluEarth E70 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
15 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Yokohama Advan dB V552 and Yokohama BluEarth E70 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama Advan dB V552 is stronger on comfort. Yokohama BluEarth E70 is stronger on treadwear and dry.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth E70 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Advan dB V552 | BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 75 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth E70 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Advan dB V552 | BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 67 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Advan dB V552 leads by 30
Why this score
| Source | Advan dB V552 | BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 54 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
BluEarth E70 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Advan dB V552 | BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth E70 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Advan dB V552 | BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 69 |
| DriverReviews owners | 80 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan dB V552 | Yokohama BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 69 |
| Dry | 72 | 75 |
| Wet | 66 | 67 |
| Comfort | 84 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 77 |
| Handling | 68 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
70
/ 100
Tire A
69
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Yokohama Advan dB V552 is widely regarded as a specialized touring tire that prioritizes cabin quietness and ride comfort above all else. While it excels at absorbing road imperfections and reducing noise for daily commuting, users note that its soft sidewall construction results in a lack of steering precision and reduced grip during high-speed maneuvers.
Pros
- Exceptional noise reduction and quiet operation
- Superior ride comfort and vibration absorption
- Effective at smoothing out potholes and road irregularities
Cons
- Soft sidewalls lead to a 'floating' sensation at highway speeds
- Lack of steering sharpness and cornering confidence
- Mediocre grip levels in both wet and dry conditions compared to performance-oriented tires
Observations
- The tire is specifically engineered as an OE fitment for vehicles like the Mazda3 BP, where its soft sidewall is intended to complement stiffer suspension bushings.
- Users report that increasing tire pressure by 3-4 PSI can mitigate the 'floating' sensation experienced at higher speeds.
The Yokohama BluEarth E70 is a polarizing OEM tire frequently criticized for high road noise and a harsh ride quality, particularly on Subaru XV and Mitsubishi Outlander models. While some users appreciate its longevity and predictable handling in dry conditions, others report significant concerns regarding wet-weather grip and a noticeable decline in performance as the tire ages.
Pros
- Excellent tread life and durability
- Predictable handling in dry conditions
- Strong fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- Capable performance on light dirt and gravel surfaces
Cons
- High levels of cabin noise on various road surfaces
- Harsh ride quality and lack of comfort
- Inconsistent or poor wet-weather traction
- Significant performance degradation as the tire wears
Observations
- Subaru XV owners frequently cite this tire as a noisy OEM choice, often leading to early replacement despite remaining tread depth.
- Users of SUV/Crossover models like the Outlander PHEV report that the tire's stiff sidewalls transmit excessive road feedback, which some find unsuitable for family vehicles.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan dB V552 | B · Yokohama BluEarth E70 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
70
/ 100
Yokohama
69
/ 100
Yokohama
Too close to call: Yokohama Advan dB V552 and Yokohama BluEarth E70 are within 2 points overall. Yokohama Advan dB V552 is stronger on comfort. Yokohama BluEarth E70 is stronger on treadwear and dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama Advan dB V552 scores 84 vs 54 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama BluEarth E70 scores 77 vs 65 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth E70 scores 75 vs 72 on dry.
Tire A · Yokohama Advan dB V552
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth E70
More comparisons
Also compared with
Yokohama Advan dB V552 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth E70 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.