75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
54 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Continental ComfortContact CC6 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
80
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
57 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Continental ComfortContact CC6 if comfort matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 78 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 86 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
ComfortContact CC6 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 75 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
BluEarth Es ES32 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ComfortContact CC6 | BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ComfortContact CC6 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 80 |
| Dry | 79 | 83 |
| Wet | 66 | 78 |
| Comfort | 89 | 86 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 75 |
| Handling | 71 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
80
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ComfortContact CC6 is widely regarded as a class-leading tire for noise reduction and ride comfort, effectively absorbing road imperfections and providing a serene cabin experience. While it excels in daily commuting and long-distance cruising, it is frequently criticized for its soft sidewalls and lackluster wet-weather performance, making it unsuitable for aggressive driving styles.
Pros
- Exceptional noise suppression and cabin quietness
- Superior ride comfort and bump absorption
- Good value for money as an entry-level eco-tire
- Reliable dry-road handling for standard commuting
Cons
- Soft sidewalls prone to damage from potholes or debris
- Poor wet-weather traction and increased risk of aquaplaning
- Noticeable decline in performance and noise levels as the tread wears down
- Lack of steering feedback and stability at higher speeds
Observations
- Users with vehicles lacking factory soundproofing, such as older compact cars, report the most significant improvements in cabin quietness.
- Drivers of taller vehicles or MPVs note that the soft sidewall leads to a lack of confidence during cornering due to increased body roll.
- Performance is highly dependent on driving style; those transitioning from performance-oriented tires often find the CC6's handling characteristics too 'mushy' or unresponsive.
The Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented tire that excels in daily driving scenarios. While most users praise its quiet operation, smooth ride quality, and reliable dry-weather grip, consensus on wet-weather performance and tread longevity is mixed, with some users reporting significant performance degradation as the tire wears.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for many users
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
- Not intended for high-performance or aggressive driving
Observations
- Users of compact hatchbacks and city cars (e.g., Honda Jazz, Fiat 500) report high satisfaction with comfort and noise levels.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles or those with high-torque engines occasionally report faster-than-expected front-tire wear.
- Some users noted that the tire requires a 'break-in' period of several hundred miles before reaching optimal performance.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ComfortContact CC6 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Continental
80
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better wet, handling and dry. Pick the Continental ComfortContact CC6 if comfort matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 78 vs 66 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 81 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 83 vs 79 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ComfortContact CC6 scores 89 vs 86 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ComfortContact CC6
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ComfortContact CC6 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.