69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
45/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental ProContact GX vs Michelin CrossClimate+ — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
88/100
16 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
117 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better treadwear, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | ProContact GX | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 88 |
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 87 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | ProContact GX | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 85 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | ProContact GX | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 70 |
| Tire Rack owners | 63 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 82 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | ProContact GX | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 78 |
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 86 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ProContact GX | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 33
Why this score
| Source | ProContact GX | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 53 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 86 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | ProContact GX | CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ProContact GX | Michelin CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 84 |
| Dry | 78 | 88 |
| Wet | 78 | 85 |
| Snow | 63 | 75 |
| Comfort | 76 | 81 |
| Noise | – | 76 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 86 |
| Handling | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
The Michelin CrossClimate+ is widely regarded as a benchmark all-season tire, praised for its exceptional versatility and ability to bridge the gap between summer handling and winter safety. While most users report high levels of confidence in wet, dry, and snowy conditions, a minority of users note a decline in performance as the tread wears down or express dissatisfaction with noise levels and ride harshness on specific vehicle setups.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence in light to moderate snow and ice.
- Strong wet and dry road handling that rivals dedicated summer tires.
- Impressive tread longevity and durability over high mileage.
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for the majority of users.
- Consistent performance across a wide range of temperatures.
Cons
- Performance in wet conditions can diminish significantly as the tire wears.
- Increased road noise reported by some users compared to dedicated summer tires.
- Occasional reports of a harsh or 'bouncy' ride on certain vehicle suspensions.
- Higher price point compared to competitors.
- Some users report a 'spongy' or less precise steering feel during aggressive cornering.
Observations
- Users with heavier diesel vehicles or high-torque setups occasionally report faster tread wear and increased road noise.
- Drivers of lighter vehicles (e.g., small hatchbacks) often report improved steering responsiveness and comfort compared to OEM tires.
- Performance on SUVs and 4x4s is frequently cited as a major upgrade over standard summer tires, particularly for winter mountain driving.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ProContact GX | B · Michelin CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 8 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 400 - 540 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Continental
84
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better treadwear, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 86 vs 53 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 75 vs 63 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 88 vs 78 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 85 vs 78 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ProContact GX
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate+
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental ProContact GX also compared with
Michelin CrossClimate+ also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.